Commentary

Video

Dr Vergote on the Efficacy of Tisotumab Vedotin in Recurrent/Metastatic Cervical Cancer

Ignace B. Vergote, MD, PhD, discusses the efficacy of tisotumab vedotin-tftv in patients with recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer, according to data from the phase 3 innovaTV 301/ENGOT-cx12/GOG-3057 trial (NCT04697628).

Ignace B. Vergote, MD, PhD, chairman, Leuven Cancer Institute, head, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, the Catholic University of Leuven, Belgium, discusses the efficacy of tisotumab vedotin-tftv (Tivdak) in patients with recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer, according to data from the phase 3 innovaTV 301/ENGOT-cx12/GOG-3057 trial (NCT04697628).

The single-arm trial enrolled patients with recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer and documented disease progression on or after doublet chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab and an anti–PD(L)1 agent, if eligible and available. Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive either intravenous tisotumab vedotin (n = 253) or investigator’s choice of either topotecan, vinorelbine, gemcitabine, irinotecan, or pemetrexed (n = 249).

Previously reported data from this trial supported the FDA's accelerated approval of tisotumab vedotin in 2021 for patients with recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer with disease progression on or after chemotherapy, Vergote notes.

Results from a planned interim analysis of the trial were presented at the 2023 ESMO Congress, and showed that patients treated with tisotumab vedotin experienced a 30% reduction in the risk of death vs investigator’s choice of chemotherapy as second- or third-line therapy. At a median follow-up of 10.8 months (95% CI, 10.3-11.6), tisotumab vedotin produced a statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvement in median OS of 11.5 months (95% CI, 9.8-14.9) vs 9.5 months (95% CI, 7.9-10.7) with chemotherapy (HR, 0.70, 95% CI, 0.54-0.89; P = .0038). The 12-month OS rates were 48.7% with tisotumab vedotin and 35.3% with chemotherapy.

Additionally, tisotumab vedotin produced a median progression-free survival (PFS) of 4.2 months (95% CI, 4.0-4.4) compared with 2.9 months (95% CI, 2.6-3.1) with chemotherapy (HR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.54-0.82; P < .0001). The 6-month PFS rates were 30.4% and 18.9% with tisotumab vedotin and chemotherapy, respectively.

These updated data further support the use of tisotumab vedotin as a standard of care for patients in this population who have historically had limited treatment options, Vergote concludes.

Related Videos
Viktor Grünwald, MD, PhD
Aaron Gerds, MD
Christine M. Lovly, MD, PhD, Ingram Associate Professor of Cancer Research, associate professor, medicine (hematology/oncology), Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center
Haeseong Park, MD, MPH
David L. Porter, MD
Timothy Yap, MBBS, PhD, FRCP
Leo I. Gordon, MD, Abby and John Friend Professor of Oncology Research, professor, medicine (hematology and oncology), Feinberg School of Medicine, Robert H. Lurie Cancer Center
Hetty E. Carraway, MD, MBA, staff associate professor, Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University; member, Immune Oncology Program, Case Comprehensive Cancer Center; vice chair, Strategy and Enterprise Development, Taussig Cancer Institute, Division of Hematologic Oncology and Blood Disorders, Cleveland Clinic
David A. Braun, MD, PhD, assistant professor, medicine (medical oncology), Louis Goodman and Alfred Gilman Yale Scholar, member, Center of Molecular and Cellular Oncology, Yale Cancer Center
Julia Foldi, MD, PhD