Dr. Nielsen on the Pros and Cons of the Ki67 Assay

Torsten O. Nielsen, MD, PhD, FRCPC
Published Online: Thursday, September 26, 2013
Torsten O. Nielsen, MD, PhD, FRCPC, a professor of pathology at the University of British Columbia, discusses the pros and cons of using the Ki67 as a prognostic marker in breast cancer.

Nielsen says there is extensive literature on the clinical validity of Ki67. It is a marker of proliferation that assists in the prognosis of breast cancer and many believe an assay could have a role in the prediction of the disease. Nielsen also notes that testing for Ki67 could be a substitute for a more complex, expensive test.

However, the Ki-67 tumor marker test is not without problems, Nielsen says. There is poor analytical reproducibility with Ki67 scores, especially within the critical 10-20% range.

Although the fundamentals of the assay work well, Nielsen says, the scoring and interpretation of the test are difficult to reproduce.

Online CME Activities
Free CME from PER
Evolving Management Strategies for Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
Community Practice Connections™: Current and Emerging Strategies in the Management of Early Breast Cancer
Cancer Summaries and Commentaries™: Update from Vienna: Advances in the Treatment of Gastrointestinal Cancers
Advances in Targeted Therapy: The Emerging Role of PARP Inhibitors in the Treatment of Cancers
More Reading