Bringing the Oncology Community Together

PARP Inhibitors Intriguing Despite Research Setbacks

Anita T. Shaffer
Published Online: Thursday, April 26, 2012
Michael J. Birrer, MD, PhD
Michael J. Birrer, MD, PhD
Professor of Medicine Harvard Medical School Director, Gynecologic Medical Oncology Director, Gynecologic Cancer Research Program Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center Boston, MA

Early excitement over the potential for using PARP inhibitors in the treatment of patients with ovarian cancer has dissipated amid disappointing findings on overall survival, but the class of novel therapeutics remains under active investigation for patients with this tumor type.

At least three pharmaceutical companies are continuing development programs with various PARP agents, noted Michael J. Birrer, MD, PhD, in a recent interview. He spoke shortly after AstraZeneca announced its decision to halt studies of olaparib for maintenance treatment of serous ovarian cancer.

“I haven’t given up hope on this,” said Birrer, referring to the class of PARP inhibitors as a whole. “I think you’ll see trials with PARP inhibitors testing the ability and activity of bringing the PARP inhibitor up front in newly diagnosed patients in combination with chemotherapy. Most of those trials will also include a maintenance phase. In conjunction with that, there will be selective trials in BRCA1- and BRCA2- mutated patients with recurrent resistant disease.”

PARP, poly(adenosine diphosphate [ADP]–ribose) polymerase, plays an important role in the repair of single-strand DNA breaks. Birrer said single-strand breaks can become double-strand breaks that are, in turn, repaired by a complex that contains BRCA1 and BRCA2. Thus, he said, researchers have theorized that inhibiting the PARP enzyme should selectively kill cells with those genetic abnormalities.

Earlier studies had demonstrated higher antitumor activity and objective response rates for patients with and without BRCA1/2 mutations, a phase II trial highlighted at the 2011 American Society of Clinical Oncology Annual Meeting in June did not require that mutation status. Eligible patients had recurrent, platinum-sensitive ovarian or fallopian-tube cancer or primary peritoneal cancer with high-grade (grade 2 or 3) serous features or a serous component.

The trial, which AstraZeneca sponsored, demonstrated that olaparib improved median progression-free survival by 65% among the 136 patients randomized to receive 400-mg doses twice daily, compared with 129 participants on placebo. Investigators believed the compound showed promise as monotherapy for this patient population.

In December, however, AstraZeneca announced the company would not move forward with phase III development in the maintenance setting after interim data “indicated that the previously reported progression-free survival benefit is unlikely to translate into an overall survival benefit, the definitive measure of patient benefit in ovarian cancer. In addition, attempts to identify a suitable tablet dose for use in phase III studies have not been successful.”

In March, researchers detailed those results in The New England Journal of Medicine. They reported median progression-free survival of 8.4 months with olaparib versus 4.8 months on placebo. Adverse events were more prevalent among those who received olaparib, but most of those events were grade 1/2, with nausea, fatigue, vomiting, and anemia among the most frequently reported effects.

Stage IIC Cancer

Stage IIC Ovarian Cancer

This illustration depicts ovarian cancer at stage IIC. One noteworthy PARP study included patients with grade 2 or 3 serous ovarian cancer.

However, the interim survival analysis, conducted after 38% of the participants had died, did not show a significant advantage for olaparib, which demonstrated a hazard ratio of 0.94 (95% confidence interval, 0.63-1.39; P = 0.75).

Page: 12Next Page (2) >>
Related Articles
Irregular Menstruation Linked to Higher Risk of Ovarian Cancer Death
A prospective study found that women with irregular menstrual cycles have a 2.4-fold increased risk of dying from ovarian cancer compared to women with normal menstrual cycles
Ellen Matloff on Oophorectomy Timing for BRCA Carriers
Ellen T. Matloff, MS, CGC, director, Yale Cancer Genetic Counseling Program at the Yale School of Medicine/Yale Cancer Center, discusses the proper age for a carrier of the BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation to undergo oophorectomy.
Integrating Genetic Counseling Into an Oncology Practice Can Benefit High-Risk Families
Genetic counseling—including testing and risk assessment—is one of the most rapidly growing areas of oncology and has become the standard of care for patients with a personal and family history of breast, ovary, or colon cancer.
Preventative Ovarian Surgery in BRCA1 Mutation Carriers More Beneficial Before Age 35
For the first time, physicians have a clearer understanding of the optimum age for prophylactic oophorectomy in patients with BRCA mutations who want to reduce their risk of ovarian, fallopian tube, and breast cancer.
Most Popular Right Now
More Reading
External Resources

American Journal of Managed Care
HCPLive
PainLive
Pharmacy Times
Physicians' Education Resource
Physician's Money Digest
Specialty Pharmacy Times
TargetedOnc
OncLive Resources

Archives
Blogs
OncLive TV
Oncology Nurses
Publications
Specialties
Web Exclusives


About Us
Advertise
Advisory Board
Contact Us
Forgot Password
Privacy Policy
Terms & Conditions
Intellisphere, LLC
666 Plainsboro Road
Building 300
Plainsboro, NJ 08536
P: 609-716-7777
F: 609-716-4747

Copyright OncLive 2006-2014
Intellisphere, LLC. All Rights Reserved.