Novel RAF Inhibitor Active Across Multiple Tumor Types

Article

Treatment with the RAF dimer inhibitor BGB-283 led to clinical benefit for patients with BRAF V600-mutated melanoma, papillary thyroid cancer, and ovarian cancer.

Jayesh Desai, MD

Jayesh Desai, MD

Jayesh Desai, MD

BGB-283, a novel agent that targets RAS/RAF-mutated tumors, demonstrated activity across a variety of tumor types, in a preliminary clinical evaluation presented at the 2017 AACR Annual Meeting.

Treatment with the RAF dimer inhibitor BGB-283 led to clinical benefit for patients with BRAF V600-mutated melanoma, papillary thyroid cancer, and ovarian cancer. Antitumor activity also was observed in KRAS-mutated non—small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and endometrial cancer. The orally administered drug demonstrated a favorable risk-benefit profile, suggesting potential for use as a single agent or in combination with other therapies appropriate for BRAF- and KRAS-mutated cancers.

“BGB-283 appears to have a desirable risk-benefit profile in the combined efficacy and safety data from the phase Ia and Ib parts of this study,” said Jayesh Desai, MD, a medical oncologist at Peter MacCallum Cancer Center in Melbourne, Australia. “The clinical activity of BGB-283 observed . . . warrants further investigation in the clinic.”

A second-generation BRAF inhibitor, BGB-283 inhibits RAF dimer and EGFR feedback activation. The agent exhibits potent and reversible inhibition of BRAF V600E mutant and other RAF kinases and is a time-dependent inhibitor of BRAF kinases with very slow off-rates, said Desai. In preclinical testing, BGB-283 demonstrated activity against a variety of BRAF and KRAS-mutated xenografts and patient-derived xenograft models.

Desai reported findings from a phase Ia/b clinical trial that began with a dose-finding evaluation that identified 40 mg once daily as the maximum tolerated dose and 30 mg daily as the recommended phase II dose. In the phase Ib dose expansion phase, patients with various types of BRAF/KRAS-mutated advanced solid tumors received the recommended phase II dose.

During the phase Ia dose-escalation study involving 35 patients, antitumor activity was observed in BRAF and KRAS-mutated tumors, said Desai. Activity included 1 complete response in a patient with BRAF V600E-mutated melanoma; 1 partial response in BRAF V600E-mutated thyroid cancer; 1 partial response in KRAS-mutated endometrial cancer; and 1 unconfirmed partial response in KRAS-mutated NSCLC.

FDG-PET imaging at baseline and at the end of the first cycle of treatment with BGB-283 showed significant metabolic responses at doses of 20 mg and higher. Imaging data showed partial metabolic responses in 13 of 29 (45%) evaluable patients.

For the phase Ib evaluation, investigators enrolled 96 patients into 10 treatment arms: BRAF inhibitor/MEK inhibitor-naïve melanoma; BRAF inhibitor/MEK inhibitor-resistant melanoma; separate arms of BRAF V600E-mutated colorectal cancer (CRC), NSCLC, and papillary thyroid cancer; separate arms of KRAS/NRAS-mutated endometrial cancer, NSCLC, and CRC; other BRAF-mutated and non-V600 BRAF-mutated cancers; and other KRAS/NRAS-mutated cancers.

The 96 patients had a median age of 60, and men accounted for 56% of the total study population. Two thirds of the patients had ECOG performance status 1 (ECOG 0 for the rest); and about half had received at least 3 prior regimens (median of 3 prior regimens).

The efficacy summary showed 3 partial responses and 3 cases of stable disease among 7 evaluable patients with BRAF V600-mutated melanoma and no prior exposure to BRAF or MEK inhibitors. The objective response rate (ORR) was 42.9% and the disease control rate (DCR) was 85.7%. There was 1 partial response and 2 cases of stable disease among 3 patients with BRAF V600-mutated papillary thyroid cancer; and 1 partial response and 2 cases of stable disease in 6 patients with KRAS-mutated NSCLC (ORR, 16.7%; DCR, 50%).

In a group of 10 patients with BRAF non-V600 mutations or other solid tumors with BRAF V600 mutations, the antitumor activity of BGB-283 consisted of 2 partial responses (1 patient each with V600E-mutated melanoma and V600E-mutated ovarian cancer) and 3 cases of stable disease. Additionally, 1 patient with BRAF V600-mutated NSCLC had a partial response and another achieved stable disease during treatment with BGB-283.

Desai reported that 4 of 6 patients with BRAF V600-mutated melanoma resistant to BRAF/MEK inhibitors attained stable disease, as did 9 of 13 patients with BRAF V600-mutated CRC. Stable disease was experienced by all 5 patients with KRAS-mutated endometrial cancer, 12 of 20 patients with KRAS/NRAS-mutated CRC, and 10 of 21 patients with other KRAS/NRAS-mutated solid tumors or pancreatic cancer.

Median progression-free survival (PFS) was available for the groups with the longest follow-up. Overall, the median PFS was 5.4 months in those with KRAS-mutant endometrial cancer who were treated with an average of 3.2 prior therapies. The median PFS in the KRAS-mutant NSCLC group (2.7 prior therapies) was 4.2 months.

The most common drug-related adverse events (all grades) were fatigue (38.5%), dysphonia (26.0%), palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia syndrome (21.9%), decreased appetite (21.9%), thrombocytopenia (19.8%), acneiform dermatitis (17.7%), rash (16.7%), diarrhea (16.7%), nausea (15.6%), and glossodynia (10.4%). Grade 3/4 adverse events were relatively infrequent, the most common being fatigue (7.3%), thrombocytopenia (6.3%), and hypertension (6.3%).

Regarding the thrombocytopenia, Desai said all cases were managed by treatment interruption with or without corticosteroids. In 5 of 7 cases, platelet counts returned to normal or grade 1 level between days 7 and 21. In the other 2 patients, platelets did not normalize for more than 3 weeks.

Desai J, Gan H, Barrow C, et al. A Phase IB study of RAF dimer inhibitor BGB-283 in patients with B-RAF or K-RAS/N-RAS mutated solid tumors. Presented at: 2017 AACR Annual Meeting; April 1-5, 2017; San Washington, DC. Abstract CT002.

<<<

View more from the 2017 AACR Annual Meeting

Related Videos
Alessandro Villa, DDS, PhD, MPH
Gottfried Konecny, MD
Patrick I. Borgen, MD
Gottfried E. Konecny, MD, lead clinician, gynecologic oncology, Department of Medicine, the University of California, Los Angeles
Anna Lee, MD, MPH
Kari Hacker, MD, PhD, NYU Grossman School of Medicine
Janos L. Tanyi, MD, PhD, associate professor, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania
Reshma Lillaney Mahtani, DO
Christian Marth, MD, PhD, head, professor, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Innsbruck Medical University
Mansoor Raza Mirza, MD, chief oncologist, Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital