Results for Lu-Dotatate in Patients With Midgut NETs Continue to Impress

Lauren M. Green @OncNurseEditor
Published: Tuesday, Jan 19, 2016

Dr. Jonathan Strosberg

Jonathan Strosberg, MD

For patients with advanced midgut neuroendocrine tumors (NETs), the peptide receptor radionuclide therapy Lu-Dotatate (177Lutetium DOTATATE; Lutathera) continues to confer a major therapeutic benefit, reducing the risk of disease progression or death by 79% and signaling an improvement in overall survival as well.

This update from the randomized phase III NETTER-1 trial also showed that the therapy was “quite well-tolerated,” according to lead author Jonathan R. Strosberg, MD, a medical oncologist with Moffitt Cancer Center, who presented the results during a presscast at the 2016 Gastrointestinal (GI) Cancers Symposium to be held January 21-23 in San Francisco, California.

Lu-Dotatate represents the latest generation of peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT), whereby a radioactive isotope is attached to a somatostatin analog to better target the radiation to tumors expressing the somatostatin receptors that are present in most highly differentiated neuroendocrine tumors.

Earlier iterations of the therapy have been studied widely in Europe, where it has delivered promising results in early-phase trials and where a pathway exists for hospitals to produce their own radiopharmaceuticals to administer to their patients, an option not currently available in the United States.

The international NETTER-1 trial involved 229 patients with inoperable, somatostatin receptor-positive NETs in the small intestine and proximal colon, which is the most common primary site for advanced NETs. The patients had all progressed on standard-dose somatostatin analog (SSA) therapy. They were evenly randomized to either 4 administrations of 7.4 GBq of Lu-Dotatate every 8 weeks or a control arm receiving high-dose octreotide LAR (60 mg, every 4 weeks), equivalent to twice the standard 30-mg dose. After their PRRT treatment ended, patients in the experimental arm continued on a standard-dose SSA until progression.

The trial’s primary endpoint of progression-free survival (PFS) was assessed every 12 weeks based on RECIST criteria and met in an “extremely impressive fashion,” said Strosberg. Twenty-three progressions or deaths occurred with Lu-Dotatate, compared with 67 events in the control arm (HR, 0.21; P <.0001).

Median PFS in the control arm was 8.4 months, but it has not yet been reached in the Lu-Dotatate arm. “In fact, in the roughly year-and-a-half duration of follow-up thus far, we can see that the expected median PFS is likely to be longer than 3 years,” Strosberg predicted.

One complete response was reported with Lu-Dotatate and 17 partial responses. There were no complete responses in the control arm and only 3 partial responses, translating into an objective response rate of 18% with Lu-Dotatate versus 3% with the SSA octreotide LAR (P = .0008).

“This is a population of patients with midgut neuroendocrine tumors that has been highly resistant to systemic treatments, at least as far as response rate is concerned,” Strosberg pointed out, with most response rates being in the single digits in the early studies. “This is the only study to show a double-digit objective response rate in this population.”

Final overall survival (OS) data are expected next year, but based after an interim OS analysis, 22 deaths occurred in the control arm versus 13 with Lu-Dotatate (P = .0186.) Strosberg said that though this is not a statistically significant finding at this point, “it is certainly suggestive of improvement in overall survival.”

The findings being presented at the GI Cancers Symposium feature additional safety data from NETTER-1, Strosberg explained. The trial results also were presented last fall at the 2015 European Cancer Congress and the 2015 NANETS Symposium.

Overall, the numbers of adverse events (AEs), including serious side effects, were similar between the two treatment groups. Nausea (all grade) was reported in 59% of patients in the Lu-Dotatate arm versus 12% with controls, and vomiting occurred in 47% and 10% of patients, respectively. Strosberg suggested that most of these GI side effects were related to the amino acid infusions that were used as nephroprotective drugs in combination with the Lu-Dotatate. The trial mandated commercial formulations of these agents, which Strosberg said are quite nauseating, adding that in Europe, modified amino acid formulations are used that are much less so. “The nausea and vomiting typically resolved once the amino acid was discontinued, and the duration of infusion is roughly 4 to 6 hours,” he said.

“The safety profile with Lutathera appears to be quite favorable, with no clinically relevant findings, particularly with respect to the main concerns, which are hematologic, renal, and hepatic parameters.”

View Conference Coverage
Online CME Activities
TitleExpiration DateCME Credits
Community Practice Connections™: 18th Annual International Lung Cancer Congress®Oct 31, 20181.5
Provider and Caregiver Connection™: Addressing Patient Concerns While Managing Chemotherapy Induced Nausea and VomitingOct 31, 20182.0
Publication Bottom Border
Border Publication