Extended Phase III Data Illuminates Ibrutinib Survival Benefit in CLL

Silas Inman @silasinman
Published: Sunday, Mar 20, 2016

Dr Jennifer R. Brown

Jennifer R. Brown, MD, PhD

Extended follow-up data continue to demonstrate the efficacy and tolerability of ibrutinib (Imbruvica) in previously treated patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), including those with high-risk gene mutations and prognostic features, according to a poster presented at the 2016 International Congress on Hematologic Malignancies.

In the 18-month analysis of the phase III RESONATE study, which was pivotal in the full FDA approval for the BTK inhibitor, treatment with ibrutinib reduced the risk of progression or death by 89% versus ofatumumab. Additionally, despite crossover, ibrutinib improved overall survival by 52% compared with ofatumumab (HR, 0.475; 95% CI, 0.284-0.795) with an 18-month OS rate of 86% in the BTK inhibitor arm.

“We've reported now on 18-month follow-up of the RESONATE trial, which is still relatively early, but we see that in the ibrutinib arm, 76% of patients remain progression-free on ibrutinib,” said lead author Jennifer R. Brown, MD, PhD, director, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Center, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute. “We looked at some of the high-risk features, and within the ibrutinib arm there is presently no differences between the progression-free survival and the response rates in those high risk features.”

The phase III study randomized 391 patients with CLL and small lymphocytic leukemia (SLL) in a 1:1 ratio to either ibrutinib (n = 195) or ofatumumab (n = 196). Oral ibrutinib was administered at 420 mg daily and intravenous ofatumumab was administered initially at 300 mg in the first cycle followed by 2000 mg in 11 doses over 24 weeks. Following an interim analysis, the study was unblinded and 123 patients (63%) in the ofatumumab arm crossed over to receive ibrutinib.

Patient characteristics were balanced between the two arms. The median age of patients was 67 years, and approximately 40% were ≥70. Patients in the ibrutinib arm received a median of 3 prior therapies, whereas those in the ofatumumab arm had received a median of 2 prior therapies. Del17p and Del11q were present in a third of patients each. IGHV was unmutated in 73% of those in the ibrutinib arm and for 63% in the ofatumumab group.

Median PFS in the ibrutinib arm was not reached compared with 8.1 months with ofatumumab (HR, 0.106; 95% CI, 0.075-0.151; P <.0001). The 18-month PFS rate was 76% with ibrutinib versus 8% with ofatumumab (P <.001).

The objective response rate (ORR) with ibrutinib was 90% versus 25% with ofatumumab (P <.0001). Overall, 13 patients achieved a complete response (CR) or CR with incomplete hematologic recovery (CRi) in the ibrutinib arm versus 1 with ofatumumab. Median time to CR/CRi with ibrutinib was 11 months.

“The interesting feature is that most do not have complete remissions, the complete remission rate is low, but the partial remissions they have stay stable for an extended duration, and they do tend to improve over time for most of the patients,” said Brown.

A similar PFS advantage was observed across all subgroups within the study, including gene mutations. In the del11q group, the 12-month PFS was 89% versus 8% with ofatumumab (P <.01). In the IGHV unmutated group, the 12-month PFS was 86% versus 12% for ibrutinib and ofatumumab, respectively (P <.05).

NOTCH1 mutations were associated with an inferior response to ofatumumab. In this group, the 12-month PFS rate with ibrutinib was 83% versus 11% with ofatumumab (P = .0064). In the TP53-mutated and unmutated groups, the 12-month PFS rates with ibrutinib were 85% and 91% versus 17% and 23% in the ofatumumab arm, respectively.

In those with BIRC3 mutations, the 12-month PFS rate with ibrutinib was 100% versus 0% with ofatumumab, although there were too few patients to demonstrated statistical significance. Additionally, there were too few patients with MYD88 mutations to draw a concrete conclusion.

Those treated with just 1 prior therapy experienced a significantly better response with ibrutinib versus those treated with >1 prior therapy (HR, 3.294; 95% CI, 1.019-10.65; P = .0348). The ORR with ibrutinib in those who received 1 prior therapy was 100% versus 81% and 79% for those treated with 2 or ≥3 prior therapies, respectively (P = .003). ORR was consistent across all subgroups and gene mutations.

Dose reductions due to adverse events (AEs) were required for 8% of patients in the ibrutinib arm, and 7% discontinued ibrutinib due to AEs. The majority of AEs reported in the ibrutinib arm were grade 1 in severity. The most frequently reported bleeding AEs with ibrutinib, which were primarily grade 1, were an increased tendency to bruise, petechiae, and contusion.


View Conference Coverage
Online CME Activities
TitleExpiration DateCME Credits
Medical Crossfire®: Key Questions for the Use of Immunotherapy Throughout the Disease Continuum for NSCLC in an Era of Rapid DevelopmentSep 29, 20181.5
Provider and Caregiver Connection™: Addressing Patient Concerns While Managing GlioblastomaSep 29, 20182.0
Publication Bottom Border
Border Publication
x