Select Topic:
Browse by Series:

Combining Anti-HER2 Agents With Immunotherapy for HER2+ mBC

Insights From: William J. Gradishar, MD, Northwestern University; Sara A. Hurvitz, MD, UCLA Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center; Ian E. Krop, MD, PhD, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
Published: Friday, Jan 31, 2020



Transcript: 

William J. Gradishar, MD: Immunotherapy is obviously something that has been slow in breast cancer. But now all of a sudden we have data with atezolizumab and pembrolizumab suggesting that either in the advanced setting or even in the preoperative setting, the drugs may enhance either the pCR  [pathologic complete response] rate, which was something demonstrated in the KEYNOTE trial reported at ESMO [European Society for Medical Oncology Congress 2019] or with atezolizumab plus nab-paclitaxel in the advanced metastatic disease setting. We still have challenges trying to identify the patients who are most likely to benefit from those drugs. Obviously pembrolizumab seems to have a broader sweep of patients who might be candidates, whereas with atezolizumab you had to have a tumor that was PD-L1 [programmed death-ligand 1] positive to really garner the benefits from that combination.

As we go forward, it was often thought historically that triple-negative breast cancer patients alone would most likely benefit from the I/O [immuno-oncology] strategy. But now there’s a lot of interest in combining I/O checkpoint inhibitors with HER2 [human epidermal growth factor receptor 2]–directed therapy and even in the endocrine-responsive subset of breast cancer, trying to make what are viewed as generally cold tumors hotter. In the instance of endocrine therapy, CDK4/6 inhibitors are thought to stimulate tumors to be hotter, so to speak, and they may then become candidates for combination with I/O therapy.

In the HER2 space, we don’t have much in the way of data yet, but there are clinical trials ongoing looking at the combination of HER2-directed therapy with I/O therapy. And my guess is we’ll be seeing data: not only early data at this meeting, but also by ASCO [the American Society of Clinical Oncology Annual Meeting] in 2020 and beyond. Whether that turns into a strategy that we would employ broadly, we just have to wait for the results.

Sara A. Hurvitz, MD: It’s only natural that HER2-targeted therapies are being evaluated in combination with immune checkpoint inhibitors, given that the immune system has been shown to be upregulated. The presence of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in HER2-positive tumors has been demonstrated over and over, so the thought is that if you can combine an immune checkpoint inhibitor with a HER2-targeted therapy, you might augment that response and have better outcomes. The data have been lukewarm impressive at this point.

KATE2 was an interesting study. T-DM1 [trastuzumab emtansine] combined with atezolizumab didn’t meet its primary end point, and I think it’s going to be really important to define which patients are most likely to respond by PD-L1–positive status. I do think drugs like margetuximab, which enhance the ADCC [antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity] by tightening that bond between the Fc portion and Fc receptor of the person’s immune system, should be combined with immunotherapy to augment that activity. I think we’ll see better results than we even saw with SOPHIA if we can combine margetuximab with I/O.

Ian E. Krop, MD, PhD: So far, the data have been somewhat marginal. There is a relatively small trial called PANACEA that combined trastuzumab with the PD-1 [programmed cell death protein 1] inhibitor pembrolizumab, which did show what I think is proof of concept. Those patients, all of whom have had prior trastuzumab, did show a 15% objective response rate in those who had PD-L1–positive, HER2-positive cancers. Certainly not an overwhelming signal of efficacy, but clearly there were some responses suggesting that at least in a subset of patients, adding a checkpoint inhibitor may be beneficial.

We saw similar types of data in the KATE2 trial, which randomized patients to either T-DM1, with or without a checkpoint inhibitor. And that study did not meet its overall end point of improvement in progression-free survival and the intention-to-treat population, but again, similar to what we saw in PANACEA, in the PD-L1–positive patients it looked like a strong trend toward improvement in progression-free survival and overall survival with the addition of the checkpoint inhibitor to T-DM1.
 
I think we’re seeing a signal of improved efficacy, but we need to build on that. And there are a number of other studies going on looking at the combination of immunotherapies, particularly PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitors, with HER2-directed therapy. There is a study going on in the United States that’s looking at a new immune target called 4-1BB, which is another target on immune cells that can stimulate not only T cells to attack tumors but also NK [natural killer] cells, which are the main mediators of ADCC, or antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity. There are preclinical data saying that a 4-1BB agonist may be synergistic with trastuzumab to get more ADCC activity, so there is a randomized trial called AVIATOR that’s comparing chemotherapy and trastuzumab with either that regimen plus the PD-L1 inhibitor, avelumab; or chemotherapy, trastuzumab, avelumab, and a new 4-1BB agonist called utomilumab.

So there are a number of interesting ideas being tested right now. But from the available data, it’s hard to say that immunotherapy is an active agent to be used in HER2-positive metastatic disease, but we’re continuing to work hard to try to change that.

Transcript Edited for Clarity
Slider Left
Slider Right


Transcript: 

William J. Gradishar, MD: Immunotherapy is obviously something that has been slow in breast cancer. But now all of a sudden we have data with atezolizumab and pembrolizumab suggesting that either in the advanced setting or even in the preoperative setting, the drugs may enhance either the pCR  [pathologic complete response] rate, which was something demonstrated in the KEYNOTE trial reported at ESMO [European Society for Medical Oncology Congress 2019] or with atezolizumab plus nab-paclitaxel in the advanced metastatic disease setting. We still have challenges trying to identify the patients who are most likely to benefit from those drugs. Obviously pembrolizumab seems to have a broader sweep of patients who might be candidates, whereas with atezolizumab you had to have a tumor that was PD-L1 [programmed death-ligand 1] positive to really garner the benefits from that combination.

As we go forward, it was often thought historically that triple-negative breast cancer patients alone would most likely benefit from the I/O [immuno-oncology] strategy. But now there’s a lot of interest in combining I/O checkpoint inhibitors with HER2 [human epidermal growth factor receptor 2]–directed therapy and even in the endocrine-responsive subset of breast cancer, trying to make what are viewed as generally cold tumors hotter. In the instance of endocrine therapy, CDK4/6 inhibitors are thought to stimulate tumors to be hotter, so to speak, and they may then become candidates for combination with I/O therapy.

In the HER2 space, we don’t have much in the way of data yet, but there are clinical trials ongoing looking at the combination of HER2-directed therapy with I/O therapy. And my guess is we’ll be seeing data: not only early data at this meeting, but also by ASCO [the American Society of Clinical Oncology Annual Meeting] in 2020 and beyond. Whether that turns into a strategy that we would employ broadly, we just have to wait for the results.

Sara A. Hurvitz, MD: It’s only natural that HER2-targeted therapies are being evaluated in combination with immune checkpoint inhibitors, given that the immune system has been shown to be upregulated. The presence of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in HER2-positive tumors has been demonstrated over and over, so the thought is that if you can combine an immune checkpoint inhibitor with a HER2-targeted therapy, you might augment that response and have better outcomes. The data have been lukewarm impressive at this point.

KATE2 was an interesting study. T-DM1 [trastuzumab emtansine] combined with atezolizumab didn’t meet its primary end point, and I think it’s going to be really important to define which patients are most likely to respond by PD-L1–positive status. I do think drugs like margetuximab, which enhance the ADCC [antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity] by tightening that bond between the Fc portion and Fc receptor of the person’s immune system, should be combined with immunotherapy to augment that activity. I think we’ll see better results than we even saw with SOPHIA if we can combine margetuximab with I/O.

Ian E. Krop, MD, PhD: So far, the data have been somewhat marginal. There is a relatively small trial called PANACEA that combined trastuzumab with the PD-1 [programmed cell death protein 1] inhibitor pembrolizumab, which did show what I think is proof of concept. Those patients, all of whom have had prior trastuzumab, did show a 15% objective response rate in those who had PD-L1–positive, HER2-positive cancers. Certainly not an overwhelming signal of efficacy, but clearly there were some responses suggesting that at least in a subset of patients, adding a checkpoint inhibitor may be beneficial.

We saw similar types of data in the KATE2 trial, which randomized patients to either T-DM1, with or without a checkpoint inhibitor. And that study did not meet its overall end point of improvement in progression-free survival and the intention-to-treat population, but again, similar to what we saw in PANACEA, in the PD-L1–positive patients it looked like a strong trend toward improvement in progression-free survival and overall survival with the addition of the checkpoint inhibitor to T-DM1.
 
I think we’re seeing a signal of improved efficacy, but we need to build on that. And there are a number of other studies going on looking at the combination of immunotherapies, particularly PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitors, with HER2-directed therapy. There is a study going on in the United States that’s looking at a new immune target called 4-1BB, which is another target on immune cells that can stimulate not only T cells to attack tumors but also NK [natural killer] cells, which are the main mediators of ADCC, or antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity. There are preclinical data saying that a 4-1BB agonist may be synergistic with trastuzumab to get more ADCC activity, so there is a randomized trial called AVIATOR that’s comparing chemotherapy and trastuzumab with either that regimen plus the PD-L1 inhibitor, avelumab; or chemotherapy, trastuzumab, avelumab, and a new 4-1BB agonist called utomilumab.

So there are a number of interesting ideas being tested right now. But from the available data, it’s hard to say that immunotherapy is an active agent to be used in HER2-positive metastatic disease, but we’re continuing to work hard to try to change that.

Transcript Edited for Clarity
View Conference Coverage
Online CME Activities
TitleExpiration DateCME Credits
Publication Bottom Border
Border Publication
x