Pharmaceutical Leaders Highlight Promise of TIGIT

Publication
Article
Oncology Live®Vol. 18/No. 03
Volume 18
Issue 03

John Hunter, PhD, and Maya Kotturi, PhD, answer key questions about TIGIT as a target for anticancer therapy and the current development of TIGIT-targeting drugs.

John Hunter, PhD

John Hunter, PhD

John Hunter, PhD

John Hunter, PhD, is vice president and head of Antibody Research and Development for Compugen USA, Inc. He has more than 15 years of scientific research in monoclonal antibody research, genomics, and translational medicine.

OncLive: How does TIGIT act as an immune checkpoint?

Hunter and Maya Kotturi, PhD, the project team leader for Compugen’s TIGIT program, answered key questions about TIGIT as a target for anticancer therapy and the current development of TIGIT-targeting drugs.Hunter and Kotturi: TIGIT is a coinhibitory receptor that is highly expressed on effector and regulatory (Treg) CD4+ T cells, effector CD8+ T cells, and natural killer (NK) cells. TIGIT has been shown to attenuate the immune response by (1) direct signaling, (2) inducing ligand signaling, and (3) competition with and disruption of signaling by the costimulatory receptor CD226 (also known as DNAM-1).

TIGIT signaling has been best studied in NK cells, where it has been demonstrated that engagement with its cognate ligand, poliovirus receptor (PVR; also known as CD155) directly suppresses NK cell cytotoxicity through its cytoplasmic immunoreceptor tyrosine-based inhibitory motif (ITIM) domain. Knockout of the TIGIT gene or antibody blockade of TIGIT/PVR interaction has shown to enhance NK cell killing in vitro, as well as to exacerbate autoimmune diseases in vivo.

In addition to its direct effects on T and NK cells, TIGIT can induce PVR-mediated signaling in dendritic or tumor cells, leading to the increase in production of anti-inflammatory cytokines such as IL-10. In T cells, TIGIT can also inhibit lymphocyte responses by disrupting homodimerization of the costimulatory receptor CD226, and by competing with it for binding to PVR.

How does TIGIT compare with other immune checkpoints?

More recently, Compugen and others have generated data suggesting that a new check- point inhibitor, PVRIG, is involved with TIGIT in modulating the CD226 pathway to downregulate T-cell response. As we recently demonstrated with our PVRIG-targeted antibody, COM701, combination blockade of TIGIT and PVRIG significantly increases T cell-mediated proinflammatory cytokine production in vitro.There are many parallels in regulation of T-cell—mediated immunity between the CD226/TIGIT-PVR pathway and the well-defined CD28/CTLA-4–CD80/CD86 pathway. Firstly, the expression kinetics of the costimulatory and coinhibitory receptors in these 2 pathways are very similar. The costimulatory receptors CD226 and CD28 are expressed on both naïve and resting T cells, while the expression of TIGIT and CTLA-4 is induced upon lymphocyte activation. Secondly, CD226 and CD28 have a lower affinity to their respective ligands, and are therefore outcompeted by TIGIT and CTLA-4 for ligand binding. Finally, ligand binding by TIGIT and CTLA-4 attenuates T-cell responses.

TIGIT is highly expressed on lymphocytes, including tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) and regulatory T cells, that infiltrate different types of tumors. PVR is also broadly expressed in tumors, suggesting that the TIGIT-PVR signaling axis may be a dominant immune escape mechanism for cancer.

How is TIGIT being targeted?

Notably, TIGIT expression is tightly correlated with the expression of another important coinhibitory receptor, PD-1. TIGIT and PD-1 are coexpressed on the TILs of numerous human and murine tumors. Unlike TIGIT and CTLA-4, PD-1 inhibition of T-cell response does not involve competition for ligand binding with a costimulatory receptor. Antibody blockade of both TIGIT and PD-1 in preclinical tumor models synergistically induces tumor rejection, thus providing a strong rationale for TIGIT/PD-1 antibody combinations in humans.Different types of biological agents are being utilized to target immune checkpoint receptors and/or their ligands. Classically, coinhibitory receptors, such as CTLA-4, PD-1/PD-L1, and TIGIT are targeted with monoclonal antibodies that can block the interaction between the receptor and its ligand, releasing the inhibitory brake on T-cell activation.

In contrast, costimulatory receptors such as OX40, 41BB, and ICOS are targeted by monoclonal antibodies that are agonistic, and that induce signaling by the target molecules. Fc-fusion proteins comprised of the extracellular domains of either coinhibitory or costimulatory molecules are also being tested clinically as cancer therapeutics.

What are the most significant unanswered questions or challenges relating to the targeting of TIGIT?

A current focus in cancer immunotherapy, validated by recent clinical trials combining nivolumab and ipilimumab, is dual targeting of immune checkpoints with combination therapies. Trials are currently underway targeting TIGIT in combination with PD-1/PD-L1 blockade. Furthermore, Compugen’s efforts to date suggest the potential for enhanced efficacy by combining a TIGIT antibody with a PVRIG-targeted antibody.The biggest unanswered question, as is true with any first-in-class drug, is whether the antitumor activity seen with TIGIT blockade in preclinical tumor models will translate to tumor regression and improved overall survival in humans.

An additional question for clinical development of TIGIT antibodies relates to selection of the best patient population to target with an anti-TIGIT antibody. Preclinical data demonstrate that TIGIT inhibition can synergize with PD-1 pathway blockade, pointing to possible utility in treating patients refractory to therapies targeting PD-1 and PD-L1. Phase I clinical trials initiated with anti-TIGIT monoclonal antibodies, either administered alone or in combination with anti—PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies, will shed light on these questions.

Finally, there are still outstanding questions in terms of TIGIT biology. It is unclear whether TIGIT signals through its ITIM domain in T cells, and what signaling molecules may be involved. Could TIGIT have different signaling roles in NK cells, effector T cells and regulatory T cells? Understanding these aspects of TIGIT biology should lead to more effective targeting of TIGIT in patients.

Related Videos
Joachim G. J. V. Aerts, MD, PhD
Nathaniel Myall, MD
Martin Cannon, PhD, professor, Department of Microbiology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences College of Medicine
Pedro Barata, MD, MSc
In this fourth episode of OncChats: Examining LIFU–Aided Liquid Biopsy in Glioblastoma, Manmeet Singh Ahluwalia, MD, and Michael W. McDermott, MD, discuss the key objectives of the phase 3 LIMITLESS study (NCT05317858) examining low-intensity focused ultrasound with immunotherapy and chemotherapy in patients with lung cancer and brain metastases.
Brian Mitzman, MD, FACS, FCCP
Yvonne Chao, MD, PhD
Pradnya D. Patil, MD, FACP,
 In this third episode of OncChats: Traveling Through the Lung Cancer Treatment Paradigm, Aaron Franke, MD, discusses the expanding role of neoadjuvant therapy in non–small cell lung cancer and efforts to better identify patients who can benefit from curative-intent treatment.