Pazopanib Shows 3-Fold Improvement in Progression-Free Survival

Oncology & Biotech News
Published: Thursday, Aug 04, 2011
Winette T. A. van der Graaf, MD, PhD

Winette T. A. van der Graaf, MD, PhD

Data from a randomized clinical trial showed that patients with anthracycline-treated sarcomas had a 3-fold improvement in progression-free survival (PFS) with antiangiogenic agent pazopanib versus placebo.

Pazopanib treatment was associated with a median PFS of 4.6 months versus 1.5 months in the placebo group. The difference translated into a 69% reduction in the hazard for progression, as reported at last month’s ASCO meeting in Chicago.

“We may now conclude that, after decades of chemotherapy, we finally have a new drug for our patients with soft-tissue sarcomas,” said Winette T. A. van der Graaf, MD, PhD, a medical oncologist at Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center in the Netherlands. “I think pazopanib can be added to the palette of potentially active drugs. It is also important that this benefit is not restricted to rare sarcomas but has been shown to be effective in more common types of sarcomas.”

The findings came from the international multicenter phase III PALETTE trial involving patients with soft-tissue sarcomas, including leiomyosarcoma, synovial sarcoma, and fibrohistiocytic and fibroblastic sarcomas. Much of the basis for the trial came from a phase II study of pazopanib, which showed a 12-week progression-free rate of 40% to 50% in patients with advanced soft-tissue sarcomas (J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:3127-3132).

After decades of chemotherapy, we finally have a new drug for our patients with softtissue sarcomas.”
–Winette T. A. van der Graaf, MD, PhD
PALETTE investigators at 72 centers in 13 countries enrolled patients treated with as many as 4 prior chemotherapy regimens, and all patients had prior anthracycline exposure but no prior treatment with antiangiogenesis agents. Patients were randomized 2:1 to pazopanib 800 mg/day or placebo and followed until progression, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, or death. The primary endpoint was PFS, and secondary endpoints were overall survival, overall response rate, quality of life, and safety.

The final analysis included 369 randomized patients. The trial ended November 2010 with a median follow-up of 15 months.

Leiomyosarcoma accounted for more than 40% of the tumors, and about 70% of the patients had high-grade tumors at diagnosis. Aside from the required anthracycline exposure, the patients’ treatment history most often included ifosfamide (>70%), gemcitabine (35%), and docetaxel (30%). A majority of patients had received more than 2 lines of chemotherapy for advanced disease.

Analysis of the primary endpoint demonstrates a significant advantage in favor of pazopanib (P <.0001). The benefit was consistent across the 3 major histologic strata (leiomyosarcoma, synovial, and other), associated with hazard ratios of 0.19 to 0.36, all of which achieved statistical significance (P = .0002 to P <.0001).

The interim analysis of overall survival showed no significant difference between treatment groups, as the pazopanib arm had a median overall survival of 11.9 months compared with 10.4 months in the placebo group (P = .1782). van der Graaf said the final analysis of overall survival will occur before the end of the year.

Table. Best Overall Response


 
Pazopanib
n = 239
Placebo
n = 123
 
Partial response
14 (6%)
0 (0%)
 
Stable disease
164 (67%)
47 (38%)
 
Clinical benefit
73%
38%
 
Adapted from van der Graaf et al. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29(suppl; abstr LBA10002).
Best overall response in the pazopanib arm included partial responses in 6% of patients and stable disease in 67%, resulting in a clinical benefit rate of 73%. In contrast, no patient in the placebo arm had an objective response, and 38% had stable disease (Table).


View Conference Coverage
Online CME Activities
TitleExpiration DateCME Credits
Moving Forward From the Status Quo for the Treatment of Soft Tissue Sarcoma: Key Questions & New Answers to Optimize OutcomesAug 16, 20181.5
Clinical Interchange™: Moving Forward From the Status Quo for the Treatment of Soft Tissue Sarcoma: Key Questions and New Answers to Optimize OutcomesOct 31, 20182.0
Publication Bottom Border
Border Publication
x