RAS Mutation Status Key to Panitumumab Use in mCRC

Published: Tuesday, Jul 30, 2013
Dr. Jean-Yves Douillard

Jean-Yves Douillard, MD, PhD

The presence or absence of RAS mutations should dictate use of panitumumab (Vectibix) in combination with FOLFOX chemotherapy for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), two analyses of phase III data demonstrated.1,2

Patients whose tumors had wild-type RAS lived almost 6 months longer when they received the anti-EGFR antibody in addition to four cycles of FOLFOX. Tumors with RAS mutations were associated with significantly worse progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) with panitumumab.

Even among patients with wild-type exon 2, a subgroup had mutations in other RAS exons, which was associated with significantly worse survival with panitumumab plus FOLFOX4 versus FOLFOX4 alone.

“These results suggest that RAS mutation status beyond KRAS may be predictive of negative outcomes in patients receiving panitumumab plus FOLFOX4 in metastatic colorectal cancer,” concluded Kelly Oliner, PhD, principal scientist for in vitro diagnostics at Amgen, and colleagues, in a poster presentation at the 2013 ASCO Annual Meeting.

“Panitumumab plus oxaliplatin-containing regimens should not be used in patients with mutant RAS metastatic colorectal cancer tumors,” they added. “By excluding patients with mutant RAS metastatic colorectal tumors, the benefit-risk profile of panitumumab plus FOLFOX4 is improved.”

A second analysis of the phase III study also showed significant improvement in OS among patients with wild-type KRAS exon 2 mCRC treated with panitumumab plus FOLFOX4, and confirmed the inferior survival in patients with mutant KRAS exon 2.

Both analyses involved data from the PRIME randomized trial of FOLFOX4 plus panitumumab versus FOLFOX4 alone as first-line therapy for mCRC. As previously reported, the primary results showed a statistically significant 1.6-month improvement in PFS in the panitumumab arm and a trend toward improved OS in patients with wild-type KRAS exon 2 tumors. Patients with KRAS-mutant tumors had worse PFS and OS (Douillard et al. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28[31]:4697-4705).

A phase III trial of panitumumab monotherapy in mCRC also suggested lack of efficacy for anti-EGFR therapy in patients with mCRC tumors harboring mutations in KRAS or NRAS.

Oliner and colleagues presented findings from a prospectively defined retrospective comprehensive biomarker analysis, including KRAS, NRAS, and BRAF. The primary objective was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of panitumumab in patients with mutant and wild-type tumors.

PRIME involved 1083 patients. Mutation ascertainment was 90% for RAS in both treatment arms, 52% for BRAF and 89% for RAS/BRAF. Oliner reported that 325 patients in the panitumumab arm had wild-type KRAS exon 2 (codons 12/13), as did 331 in the control arm. Additionally, 221 patients in the panitumumab arm had mutant tumors, as well as 219 in the control group.

Testing for other RAS mutations and for BRAF mutations showed that 108 wild-type KRAS exon 2 tumors (17%) had other mutations, most commonly BRAF exon 15 odon 600 (9%), followed by KRAS exon 4 (6%), KRAS exon 3 (4%), NRAS exon 3 (4%), and NRAS exon 2 (3%).

Patients with any RAS mutation or a BRAF mutation had worse PFS and worse OS with panitumumab. In contrast, wild-type KRAS exon 2 tumors were associated with a 5.8-month improvement in OS among patients who received panitumumab in addition to FOLFOX4 (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.78; 95% CI, 0.62-0.99; P = .043).

The second analysis of PRIME results involved the most mature OS data reported to date. Previous analyses occurred after 54% and 68% of survival events had occurred. The updated analysis reflected 82% of patients with a survival event, reported Jean-Yves Douillard, MD, PhD, director of Clinical and Translational Research at the Integrated Oncology Centers in Saint-Herblain, France.

The exploratory analysis showed a median OS of 23.8 months in patients with wild-type KRAS exon 2 tumors treated with panitumumab versus 19.4 months in patients treated with FOLFOX4 alone (HR = 0.83; P = .03). Consistent with previous analyses, the data showed a trend toward worse survival with panitumumab in patients with mutant KRAS exon 2 tumors (15.5 vs 19.2 months; HR = 1.16; P = .16).

  1. Oliner KS, Douillard J-Y, Salvatore S, et al. Analysis of KRAS/NRAS and BRAF mutations in the phase III PRIME study of panitumumab (pmab) plus FOLFOX versus FOLFOX as first-line treatment (tx) for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). J Clin Oncol. 2013;31(suppl; abstr 3511).
  2. Douillard J-Y, Siena S, Tabernero J, et al. Overall survival (OS) analysis from PRIME: randomized phase III study of panitumumab (pmab) with FOLFOX4 for first-line metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). J Clin Oncol. 2013;31(suppl; abstr 3620).

View Conference Coverage
Online CME Activities
TitleExpiration DateCME Credits
Medical Crossfire®: Key Questions for the Use of Immunotherapy Throughout the Disease Continuum for NSCLC in an Era of Rapid DevelopmentSep 29, 20181.5
Provider and Caregiver Connection™: Addressing Patient Concerns While Managing GlioblastomaSep 29, 20182.0
Publication Bottom Border
Border Publication