VISIT US IN CHICAGO JUNE 2-4 AT BOOTH 2073!

Use of Sipuleucel-T Refined

Bonnie Gillis
Published: Tuesday, Apr 30, 2013
Dr. Eric J. Small

Eric J. Small, MD

Studies that continue to shed light on the optimal use of sipuleucel- T in men with prostate cancer were presented at the 2013 Genitourinary Cancers Symposium.

Sipuleucel-T, the first-approved vaccine for the treatment of prostate cancer; is an autologous cellular immunotherapy designed to stimulate an immune response to prostate cancer. Studies have shown that it takes approximately 6 months for the treatment effect to become evident.

Results of trials presented at this year’s GU Cancers Symposium evaluated the effect on cancer-related pain, as measured by time to first opioid administration (TFOA), in patients on sipuleucel- T; effect of the vaccine in different age groups and in patients with and without prior docetaxel; and the optimal sequencing of sipuleucel-T and androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) in men with biochemically recurrent prostate cancer.

IMPACT Trial

IMPACT was the pivotal trial leading to the FDA approval of sipuleucel-T in patients with asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). An exploratory analysis of the IMPACT trial suggests that sipuleucel-T has a clinical impact in this patient population that goes beyond its known effect on improving overall survival, according to Eric J. Small, MD, deputy director of Clinical Sciences at the UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center in San Francisco, California, and coauthors [Abstract 74].

IMPACT randomized 512 men with asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic mCRPC to a 2:1 ratio to treatment with sipuleucel-T versus placebo. Sipuleucel-T was associated with a significant improvement in overall survival (OS) compared with controls (P = .03, absolute difference of 4.1 months favoring the vaccine).

The analysis Small presented found that TFOA for cancer-related pain was significantly delayed in patients on the vaccine versus placebo (P <.041). Median TFOA was 11.9 months for sipuleucel-T versus 8.3 months for placebo.

At 12 months, 48.7% of the sipuleucel-T group and 39.7% of the placebo group were opioid-free, and the difference between the two groups was evident at 6 months, which may reflect the delayed treatment effect, Small commented.

Shorter TFOA was significantly associated with higher PSA and alkaline phosphatase levels, younger age, an ECOG performance status of 1, a Gleason score of 8 or higher, increased weight, previous primary radiotherapy, and a higher number of bone metastasis.

Subanalyses of PROCEED

Two separate analyses of the PROCEED trial showed that patients aged 80 years or older derive the same benefit from sipuleucel-T as younger patients, and that patients previously exposed to docetaxel derived a similar benefit from the vaccine as those who were docetaxel-naïve.

PROCEED is an ongoing, multicenter, phase IV registry enrolling patients who are receiving sipuleucel- T in the real-world setting.

 
Dr. Chadi Nabhan

Chadi Nabhan, MD

The first analysis presented by lead author Chadi Nabhan, MD, director, Division of Hematology/Oncology at Advocate Lutheran General Hospital in Park Ridge, Illinois, compared product parameters in 111 patients who were aged 80 years or older (20%) versus 449 patients younger than age 80 [Abstract 131]. All 560 patients had completed sipuleucel-T treatment as of September 2012.

A lower proportion of PROCEED patients were 80 years or older. Among this group, fewer patients had ECOG performance status of 0, Gleason scores of 8 or higher, and 10 or more bone metastases compared with those in the younger cohort. Both age groups had comparable total nucleated count (TNC) and antigen presenting cell (APC) activation, showing that the older patients exhibited similar immune activation compared with younger patients, with evidence of immunologic prime-boosting.

The second analysis of the same patient population compared the immunologic effects of the vaccine in patients previously exposed to docetaxel versus those who were docetaxel-naïve upon entry to the registry [Abstract 30]. These data were presented by Oliver Sartor, MD, professor of Medicine and Urology at Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, Louisianna.

Sartor noted that in the IMPACT trial, the use of docetaxel was prohibited within 3 months prior to registration, but there was no restriction on docetaxel use in the real-world PROCEED registry.


View Conference Coverage
Online CME Activities
TitleExpiration DateCME Credits
Community Practice Connections™: Personalized Sequencing in Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: Bridging the Latest Evidence to the Bedside in Clinical ManagementAug 25, 20181.5
Community Practice Connections™: Precision Medicine for Community Oncologists: Assessing the Role of Tumor-Testing Technologies in Cancer CareNov 30, 20181.0
Publication Bottom Border
Border Publication
x