Your AI-Trained Oncology Knowledge Connection!


News

Article

ATG-022 Demonstrates Safety, Preliminary Efficacy in Advanced CLDN18.2+ Gastric Cancer

Author(s):

Fact checked by:

Key Takeaways

  • ATG-022 demonstrated a manageable safety profile and promising antitumor effects in gastric cancer patients with high and low CLDN18.2 expression.
  • The phase 1 CLINCH trial included dose-escalation and dose-expansion phases, with doses ranging from 0.3 to 3.0 mg/kg.
SHOW MORE

Phase 1 study data demonstrated that ATG-022 has a manageable safety profile and produced activity in patients with gastric cancer and CLDN 18.2 expressions.

Gastric Cancer | Image Credit: © Sebastian Kaulitzki – stock.adobe.com

Gastric Cancer | Image Credit: ©

Sebastian Kaulitzki – stock.adobe.com

Treatment with antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) ATG-022 demonstrated a manageable safety profile with preliminary antitumor effects in patients with gastric cancer with high claudin18.2 (CLDN18.2) expression and low/ultra-low CLDN 18.2 expression, according to data from the phase 1 CLINCH trial (NCT05718895) presented at the 2025 Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium.1

At the data cutoff of November 22, 2024, the dose-escalation portion of the study included 16 patients, 8 of whom had gastric cancer, and these patients were treated with ATG-022 at doses of 0.3 to 3.0 mg/kg. Those with gastric cancer enrolled in the dose-expansion portion (n = 37) received 2.4 mg/kg of ATG-022 once every 3 weeks. Among patients in the dose-escalation cohort, only 1 dose-limiting toxicity of grade 3 nausea in 6 patients occurred at 3.0 mg/kg.

In the dose-expansion cohort evaluating ATG-022 at 2.4 mg/kg, 32.4% of patients experienced at least 1 serious treatment-emergent adverse effect (TEAE), and 40.5% had grade 3 or greater TEAEs. The most common TEAEs included decreased neutrophil count (51.1%), nausea (48.6%), and decreased white blood cell count (43.2%). Of note, no ophthalmological or neurological toxicities were observed.

Regarding efficacy, among patients with gastric cancer (n = 21) who underwent at least 1 tumor evaluation and had high CLDN 18.2 expression (≥immunohistochemistry [IHC] 2+), 9 patients experienced partial responses (PRs), and 11 had stable disease, translating to an overall response rate (ORR) of 42.9% and a disease control rate (DCR) of 95.2%.

Additionally, 10 patients with gastric cancer with low CLDN18.2 expression (<IHC 2+) treated with the efficacious dosage of 1.8 to 2.4 mg/kg of ATG-022; of these patients, 1 achieved a complete response (CR) and 2 had PRs. The ORR was 30%, and the DCR was 50%. Of note, the patient with a CR demonstrated a durable response and was on the study for more than 14 months as of the cutoff date.

“ATG-022 demonstrated a manageable safety profile and encouraging preliminary antitumor effects in [patients with] gastric cancer with high CLDN18.2 expression and low/ultralow CLDN18.2 expression, suggesting further clinical investigation in patients with variable CLDN18.2 expression,” lead study author Jinfeng Ma, MD, of Shanxi Cancer Hospital in China, and colleagues wrote in a poster presentation of the data. “The enrollment of [patients with] gastric cancer for dose optimization and [patients with] other solid tumors is ongoing.”

Background and CLINCH Trial Design

ATG-022 is an ADC that targets CLDN18.2 expressed in gastric and solid tumors. The agent has demonstrated activity across CLDN18.2 expression levels, including moderate to high (≥20%), low (5%-20%), and ultralow (≤5%) expression levels.

The phase 1 CLINCH study included dose-escalation and -expansion phases. Eligibility criteria included patients at least 18 years of age; histological or cytological confirmation of a solid tumor that progressed on standard therapies or intolerance to/not applicable for standard therapies; at least 1 measurable lesion per RECIST 1.1 criteria; and an ECOG performance status of 0 or 1.2

Patients from the dose-expansion phase had advanced solid tumors regardless of CLDN18.2 expression and were treated with 0.3 to 3.0 mg/kg of ATG-022 once every 3 weeks.1 The agent was evaluated for safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics. Patients who were CLDN18.2-positive (≥ IHC 1+) were enrolled in the dose-expansion phase to receive 2.4 mg/kg or 1.8 mg/kg of ATG-022 once every 3 weeks. This portion of the phase evaluated the efficacy and safety of the respective dose levels.

The primary end point of the study included the incidence of DLTs and AEs; secondary end points included ORR and DCR per RECIST 1.1 criteria.

Additional Safety Findings

Regarding safety, patients with at least one TEAE included 100% treated with 0.3 mg/kg of ATG-022 (n = 1), 100% treated with 0.9 mg/kg (n = 3), 100% treated with 1.8 mg/kg (n = 3), 100% treated with 2.4 mg/kg (n = 3), 100% treated with 3.0 mg/kg (n = 6), and 89.2% in the dose-expansion phase treated with 2.4 mg/kg (n = 37). In each respective dose cohort, serious TEAEs occurred in 100%, 0%, 33.3%, 33.3%, 83.3%, and 32.4% of patients; grade 3 or 4 TEAEs occurred in 0%, 33.3%, 66.7%, 66.7%, 100%, and 40.5% of patients, respectively.

TEAEs leading to dose interruption in the cohorts evaluating ATG-022 at 0.3 mg/kg, 0.9 mg/kg, 1.8 mg/kg, 2.4 mg/kg, 3.0 mg/kg, and 2.4 mg/kg occurred in 0%, 33.3%, 33.3%, 33.3%, 83.3%, and 24.3% of patients, respectively; TEAEs leading to patients withdrawing from treatment were reported in 0%, 0%, 33.3%, 0%, 33.3%, and 8.1% of patients, respectively. TEAEs leading to dose reduction occurred in 13.5% of patients in the 2.4 mg/kg cohort, and TEAEs leading to death occurred in 1 patient (33.3%) in the 3.0-mg/kg cohort and 3 patients (8.1%) in the 2.4-mg/kg cohort.

Among the 37 patients in the dose-expansion phase receiving 2.4 mg/kg of ATG-022, the most common TEAEs included decreased neutrophil count (any-grade, 51.4%; ≥grade 3, 18.9%), nausea (48.6%; 2.7%), decreased white blood cell count (43.2%; 2.7%), decreased weight (40.5%; 0%), decreased appetite (37.8%; 8.1%), hypoalbuminemia (37.8%; 0%), anemia (37.8%; 5.4%), vomiting (21.6%; 2.7%), alopecia (16.2%; 0%), diarrhea (16.2%; 0%); fatigue (13.5%; 2.6%), malaise (13.5%; 0%), increased blood lactate dehydrogenase levels (10.8%; 0%), increased blood alkaline phosphatase levels (10.8%; 0%), increased gamma-glutamyl transferase levels (10.8%; 0%), hypokalemia (10.8%; 0%), and pyrexia (10.8%; 0%).

References

  1. Ma J, Cao D, Zhao Q, et al. Safety and preliminary efficacy of ATG-022 in patients with advanced/metastatic gastric cancer (CLINCH). J Clin Oncol. 2025;43(suppl 4):456. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2025.43.4_suppl.456
  2. A study of ATG-022 in patients with advanced/metastatic solid tumors (CLINCH). ClincialTrials.gov. Updated April 10, 2014. Accessed January 28, 2025. https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05718895

Newsletter

Stay up to date on the most recent and practice-changing oncology data

Related Videos
Sheela Rao, MBBS, MD, FRCP
Richard T. Lee, MD, Cherng Family Director’s Chair, Center for Integrative Oncology, medical director, clinical professor, Supportive & Integrative Medicine, Department of Supportive Care Medicine, City of Hope
Rachna T. Shroff, MD, MS
Daneng Li, MD, associate professor, Department of Medical Oncology & Therapeutics Research, and co-director, Neuroendocrine Tumor Program, City of Hope
Dr Janjigian on 5-Year Data With Nivolumab Plus Chemotherapy in Gastric/GEJ/Esophageal Cancer
Susumu Hijioka, MD, PhD
Kanwal PS Raghav, MBBS, MD
Vikas S. Ostwal, MD
Dr Shreenivas on the Association Between MUC1 and CLDN18 in GI Cancers
Dr Strosberg on Cabozantinib vs Placebo in Patients With Advanced GI NETs