Cemiplimab Plus Chemotherapy Yields Responses in Advanced/Metastatic Penile Carcinoma

Cemiplimab Plus Chemotherapy in

Advanced/Metastatic Penile Carcinoma

| Image Credit: © Katsyarina – stock.adobe.com

Treatment with the combination of first-line cemiplimab-rwlc (Libtayo) and standard-of-care (SOC) platinum-based chemotherapy followed by maintenance cemiplimab conferred clinical benefit in patients with locally advanced or metastatic penile carcinoma, according to findings from the phase 2 EPIC-A trial (ISRCTN95561634), which were presented at the 2025 Genitourinary Cancers Symposium.

At 12 weeks, the clinical benefit rate (CBR) with the study treatment was 62.1% (95% CI, 44.4%-79.7%); 0 patients experienced a complete response (CR), 15 patients (51.7%) experienced a partial response (PR), and 3 patients (10.3%) had stable disease (SD). The objective response rate (ORR) at 12 weeks was 51.7% (95% CI, 34.4%-68.6%). At 21 weeks, the CBR was 48.3% (95% CI, 31.4%-65.6%); 1 patient (3.4%) had a CR, 12 patients (41.4%) had PRs, and 1 patient (3.4%) had SD. The ORR at 21 weeks was 44.8% (95% CI, 28.4%-62.4%).

For both ORR and CBR, the 95% confidence interval lower limit was greater than the null hypothesis limit of 25%.

The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 6.2 months (95% CI, 3.7-8.7), and the median overall survival (OS) was 15.5 months (95% CI, 6.0-25.0).

“The EPIC-A trial provides important data regarding the efficacy and safety of cemiplimab in combination with platinum-based chemotherapy as a treatment for [locally advanced or metastatic penile carcinoma],” presenting study author Amit Bahl, MD, of the Bristol Haematology and Oncology Centre, University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, and coauthors stated in the presentation. “These data support combination cisplatin-based chemotherapy plus cemiplimab as a first line treatment option to potentially improve outcomes in this rare cancer.”

EPIC-A was a nonrandomized, open-label trial that enrolled a total of 29 patients who received 350 mg of intravenous (IV) cemiplimab on the first day of each treatment cycle and 4 cycles of intravenous cisplatin-based chemotherapy once every 3 weeks. Patients could then transition to maintenance treatment with up to 30 cycles of 350 mg of IV cemiplimab on day 1 every 3 weeks. SOC chemotherapy consisted of either 80 mg/m² of cisplatin on day 1 and 4000 mg/m² fluorouracil on days 1 to 4; or 75 mg/m² of cisplatin, 175 mg/m² of paclitaxel (Abraxane), and 3600 mg/m² of ifosfamide.

Eligible patients had histologically proven TxN3M0, TxN2M0, T2N1M0, T4anyN, or M1 locally advanced or metastatic carcinoma of the penis; received no previous chemotherapy for treatment of penile cancer; an ECOG performance status of 0 to 2; adequate renal, liver, and bone marrow function; and measurable disease per RECIST 1.1 criteria.

The median age of patients was 61 years (range, 38-76); patients’ ECOG performance statuses were 0 (45%), 1 (48%), and 2 (7%); 24% of patients had locally advanced disease, and 76% of patient had metastatic disease. Locations of metastasis were lung (55.2%), bone (23.0%), and liver (6.9%). Patients received treatment for a median of 5 cycles (range, 1-34), and the median follow-up was 15.0 months (IQR, 6.2-21.6).

The primary trial end point was investigator-assessed CBR at 12 weeks. Secondary end points included safety; CBR at 1, 2, and 3 years; ORR, PFS, OS, and quality of life.

No new safety signals were identified with the combination, and the safety profile was consistent with previously reported data with the agents.

The most common chemotherapy-related adverse effects (AEs) of grade 3 or higher included gastrointestinal (GI) disorders (13.6%), blood and lymphatic system AEs (9.1%), infections and infestations (9.1%), and cardiac disorders (4.5%); the most common cemiplimab-related AEs were infections and infestations (22.2%), GI disorders (11.1%), immune system disorders (11.1%), and vascular disorders (11.1%).

Additionally, 23% of AEs were related to cemiplimab, and 31% of AEs were related to chemotherapy. Grade 5 AEs were observed in 2 instances; 1 was due to chemotherapy, and 0 was due to cemiplimab. Treatment discontinuation occurred in 7 patients, 4 of which were related to cemiplimab.

Reference

Bahl A, Challapalli A, Venugopal B, et al. EPIC-A: phase II trial of cemiplimab plus standard of care chemotherapy followed by maintenance cemiplimab in locally advanced or metastatic penile carcinoma. J Clin Oncol. 2025;43(suppl 5):1. doi:10.1200/JCO.2025.43.5_suppl.1