Noah D. Kauff, MD
Hysterectomy, in addition to standard risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO) measures, should be considered in women who are BRCA-positive to reduce the risk of serous uterine cancers, particularly in patients with BRCA1-positive mutations, according to a prospective study presented earlier this year at the 2015 ASCO Annual Meeting.
To better understand what these results could mean for women with BRCA-positive mutations, OncLive spoke with lead study author Noah D. Kauff, MD, gynecologist and geneticist, director, Ovarian Cancer Screening and Prevention, Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center.
OncLive: What were the goals in conducting this study?
: RRSO is a standard of care for woman with BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations. RRSO is a preventative removal of the ovaries and the fallopian tubes. This has been shown to reduce the risk of ovarian cancer by 85% to 90% in women with BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations. If the procedure is done premenopausal, it will also reduce the risk of subsequent breast cancer by 40% to 70%. It has been controversial whether or not to include hysterectomy in RRSO because it has not been clear whether or not uterine cancer is part of the tumor spectrum seen with BRCA
Serous ovarian cancers account for only about 10% of uterine cancers, however they are more aggressive and account for 40% of the uterine cancer deaths. There has been a question as to whether or not uterine serous tumors are associated with BRCA mutations. The data on this have been controversial. Two studies from 2000 and 2001 that looked at a series of women with serous uterine cancer did not find an overrepresentation of BRCA mutations. However, more recent research found a higher rate of BRCA mutations than would be expected.
How was the study conducted?
Our study was a prospective study from nine centers encompassing 1083 patients. These were all women with documented deleterious mutations in BRCA1
who had undergone RRSO with their uterus being left in situ. These women were followed for a median of 5.2 years prospectively, through a combination of a structured questionnaire and medical record review. We compared what was observed versus what we expected from SEER and we used age- and race-adjusted rates. We also needed to adjust SEER for the prevalence of hysterectomy, as 31% of women in the US over the age of 60 have had a hysterectomy and SEER does not account for this. We further stratified by the subtypes of cancer that were seen, breaking it up into carcinomas and sarcomas as well as breaking it up by endometrioid and serous carcinomas.
What were the most significant findings?
From this prospective study, we saw eight uterine cancers; we would have expected around four. This is about a 1.9% higher rate of uterine cancer than what we would have expected. This was of borderline statistical significance. However, when we looked at the specific subtypes of uterine cancer, we saw that of the eight, five were serous cancers. We would have expected just over 0.3 serous cancers, and we saw five.
... to read the full story