News >

FDA Grants Priority Review to Daratumumab in Multiple Myeloma

Silas Inman @silasinman
Published: Friday, Sep 04, 2015

Dr Craig Tendler

Craig L. Tendler, MD

The FDA has assigned a priority review designation to daratumumab as a treatment for patients with multiple myeloma either following at least 3 lines of therapy, including both a proteasome inhibitor and an immunomodulatory agent (IMiD), or in those who are double refractory to a proteasome inhibitor and an IMiD, according to the developer of the anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody, Janssen Biotech. 

The priority review was based on data from the phase II MMY2002 (SIRIUS) study that were presented at the 2015 ASCO Annual Meeting.1 In this trial, daratumumab demonstrated a 65% one-year overall survival (OS) rate and a 29.2% objective response rate (ORR) in heavily pretreated patients with double refractory multiple myeloma.

The FDA plans to make a decision on the biologics license application for daratumumab within 6 months, placing a decision on March 9, 2016. The priority review follows a breakthrough therapy designation for daratumumab that was granted by the FDA in May 2013.

“Daratumumab has the potential to be the first anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody approved to treat multiple myeloma, offering these patients an important new treatment pathway,” Craig L. Tendler, MD, vice president, Late Development and Global Medical Affairs, Oncology, Janssen, said in a statement. “The FDA's acceptance of our application for daratumumab marks an important step for people affected by multiple myeloma. We look forward to working with the FDA during this priority review.”

In the pivotal phase II study, the first 34 patients enrolled received daratumumab at 16 mg/kg (n = 16) or 8 mg/kg (n = 18). After a response evaluation, the 16 mg/kg dose was selected for future study, with an additional 90 patients enrolled at this dose (N = 106).

Patients in the trial had received a median of five prior therapies over a median of 4.8 years following diagnosis. Ninety-six percent of patients were refractory to their last treatment, including proteasome inhibitors and IMiD agents (95%).

Responses to daratumumab consisted of stringent complete responses (sCR; n = 3; 2.8%), very good partial responses (VGPR; n = 10; 9.4%), and partial responses (PR; n = 18; 17%). The median duration of response was 7.4 months. After a median follow-up of 9.4 months, 45.2% of patients remained on therapy. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 3.7 months (95% CI, 2.8-4.6).

Infusion-related reactions (IRR) predominately occurred during the first infusion and were mostly grade 1/2 (all-grade 42.5%). Grade 3 IRRs were seen in 4.7% of patients; however, no grade 4 events were experienced. No patients discontinued daratumumab as a result of an IRR.

The most common all-grade adverse events were fatigue (39.6%), anemia (33%), nausea (29.2%), thrombocytopenia (25.5%), back pain (22.6%), neutropenia (22.6%), and cough (20.8%). Overall, 4.7% of patients discontinued treatment due to adverse events. These side effects were not deemed to be associated with daratumumab.

In addition to data from the SIRIUS trial, the application also included data from four other studies, including GEN501.2 In this phase I/II study, patients who received daratumumab at 16 mg/kg (n = 42) experienced an ORR of 36%, which included 2 CRs and 2 VGPRs. At this dose, the estimated median PFS was 5.6 months (95% CI, 4.2-8.1) and the one-year OS rate was 77% (95% CI, 58-88).

ORR was higher in less heavily pretreated patients, at 56% for those who received 2 or 3 prior lines of therapy compared with 23% in a more heavily pretreated population. The estimated median duration of response in the 8 mg/kg arm was 6.9 months (95% CI, 6.2-10.6). In the 16 mg/kg arm, a median duration of response was not yet reached, with a one-year PFS rate of 65% (95% CI, 28-86).

“What is impressive about this study is that daratumumab monotherapy induced durable responses that improved or deepened over time, and 65% of responding patients remained in remission at 12 months,” lead author Henk M. Lokhorst, MD, PhD, Department of Haematology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands, said in a statement when the findings were published. “These findings speak to the potential of daratumumab as an option for patients with multiple myeloma who no longer respond to existing therapies.”

Several phase III clinical trials are looking at daratumumab in various treatment settings for patients with multiple myeloma, with 3 exploring the drug in the frontline setting. Janssen is responsible for commercialization and development of daratumumab, following an agreement with Genmab that was made in August 2012.

"We are pleased that the FDA has granted Priority Review for daratumumab in double refractory multiple myeloma," Jan van de Winkel, PhD, chief executive officer of Genmab, said in a statement. "If approved, daratumumab has the potential to make a real difference in the lives of people who have run out of other treatment options for multiple myeloma."

References

  1. Lonial S, Weiss BM, Usmani SZ, et al. Phase II study of daratumumab (DARA) monotherapy in patients with ≥ 3 lines of prior therapy or double refractory multiple myeloma (MM): 54767414MMY2002 (Sirius). J Clin Oncol. 2015;33 (suppl; abstr LBA8512).
  2. Lokhorst HM, Plesner T, Laubach JP, et al. Targeting CD38 with Daratumumab Monotherapy in Multiple Myeloma [published online August 26, 2015]. N Engl J Med. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1506348

 



View Conference Coverage
Online CME Activities
TitleExpiration DateCME Credits
Medical Crossfire®: Key Questions for the Use of Immunotherapy Throughout the Disease Continuum for NSCLC in an Era of Rapid DevelopmentSep 29, 20181.5
Provider and Caregiver Connection™: Addressing Patient Concerns While Managing GlioblastomaSep 29, 20182.0
Publication Bottom Border
Border Publication
x