News >

Rajkumar on Triplet Regimens in Multiple Myeloma

Published: Tuesday, Dec 22, 2015

S. Vincent Rajkumar, MD

S. Vincent Rajkumar, MD

With numerous newly approved drugs for patients with early-stage multiple myeloma reaching the clinics, understanding what drugs, combinations, and sequences to use has become an important area of research. Several recent studies have demonstrated increased efficacy with nominally increased adverse events in these triplet arms.

The phase III randomized SWOG S0777 study that was presented at the 2015 ASH Annual Meeting looked at bortezomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone versus lenalidomide and dexamethasone in patients with previously untreated multiple myeloma, without an intent for immediate autologous stem cell transplant.

Results of the study showed that the addition of bortezomib to lenalidomide and dexamethasone for induction therapy in previously untreated myeloma resulted in a statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvement in progression-free survival (PFS) and also an increased overall survival (OS). The triplet combination showed an acceptable safety and tolerability profile, despite increased neurotoxicity. The authors believe that this could represent a potential new standard of care.

S. Vincent Rajkumar, MD, professor of Medicine at the Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, spoke with OncLive to discuss this trial and other recent studies of triplet therapies in the treatment of early-stage multiple myeloma.

OncLive: Can you discuss the study of bortezomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone versus lenalidomide plus dexamethasone in patients with previously untreated multiple myeloma? 

Rajkumar: Brian Durie, MD, presented the SWOG study, which compared lenalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone versus lenalidomide and dexamethasone. This is a classic triplet versus doublet study. It was conducted in patients with newly-diagnosed multiple myeloma. Patients were treated until progression, and the key findings of the study were that the response rates were much higher with the triplet combination compared with lenalidomide and dexamethasone. PFS was longer. However, the the most important finding is that OS was also prolonged significantly with the bortezomib, lenalidomide, dexamethasone combination.

This, of course, is a major finding. It is one of the first trials in which a modern triplet has come out on top in OS. As a result, at the Mayo Clinic, we have changed our guidelines to bortezomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone as our standard for frontline therapy.

How do you think this information will impact clinical practice?

In clinical practice, there have been a number of regimens used in multiple myeloma for frontline therapy in the United States. The NCCN, for example, on their website recommends approximately 20 different regimens for newly-diagnosed myeloma. This actually gives physicians more clarity. Today, this is probably the only regimen—modern regimen—which has a clear OS benefit over the other competitors. There will be some more uniformity in practice in that, unless there are problems with cost or lack of access or availability, Bortezomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone would be kind of a standard frontline regimen for patients with untreated multiple myeloma.

Nowadays, we do recommend a different dosing schedule for bortezomib than was used in the trial. The once-weekly subcutaneous schedule is what we are using, and that's what we would continue to use.

The tolerability between the two different arms was similar. Were there any additional toxicities found?

Mostly the same. There's always going to be extra side effects when you use a triplet combination, and those were seen, but they were, by and large, as expected and not something that we cannot manage. Neuropathy was much higher than what we would like to see. However, like I said, if we use the once-weekly subcutaneous schedule of bortezomib, which should be much lower, it may even prove to be more efficacious because we can give treatment for a longer period of time.

Do you foresee any other combinations with bortezomib that you think might be tested for this population?

The other two combinations are bortezomib, thalidomide, and dexamethasone, and bortezomib, cyclophosphamide, and dexamethasone. Those have been used in the United States, as well. We heard about another trial yesterday where bortezomib, thalidomide, and dexamethasone was compared with bortezomib, cyclophosphamide, and dexamethasone, and the bortezomib, thalidomide, and dexamethasone arm had higher response rates.

In the United States, we do have the option of using lenalidomide, which is a more modern immunomodulatory drug than thalidomide, and that's why the bortezomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone triplet will take over here.

View Conference Coverage
Online CME Activities
TitleExpiration DateCME Credits
Community Practice Connections™: Addressing Post-Transplant Obstacles: Current and Emerging Strategies to Evolve the Standard of Care for Patients With Graft-Versus-Host DiseaseMar 28, 20192.0
2017 Year in Review™: Clinical Impact of Immunotherapies in the Treatment of CancerMar 30, 20191.75
Publication Bottom Border
Border Publication