The RAS Chase: Gaining Ground Against the Toughest Oncogene

Marijke Vroomen Durning, RN | May 24, 2016
Philip A. Philip, MD, PhD

Philip A. Philip, MD, PhD

Nearly 35 years after its discovery as the first human oncogene, RAS remains a frustrating target in anticancer therapy even as knowledge about the molecular drivers of malignancies continues to expand at a rapid pace. Thus far, no therapies aimed directly at RAS mutations have been developed.

Nevertheless, a concerted effort by the National Cancer Institute (NCI) is starting to unravel the RAS mystery by building the scientific foundation for researchers to move forward. Researchers are producing a more detailed roadmap of the cellsignaling networks set into motion by mutations in the gene along with a more accurate databank for mutations in the 180 genes in the pathway. Notably, a new method for producing a key RAS protein from insect cells has yielded higher-quality material for experiments.

The focus on RAS is understandable, considering its important role in tumorigenesis. More than 30% of all tumors have some sort of mutation in the RAS family of genes, according to Sara Hook, PhD, RAS program officer at the NCI.

“If we had effective inhibitors to RAS, or the RAS pathway, it could radically change cancer treatment just because of the sheer volume of patients who would be affected,” Hook said in an interview with OncologyLive.

From Rats to Humans

The observation that RAS genes could cause cancer was initially discovered in rat sarcomas; hence the name, RA for rat and S for sarcoma. These genes were later identified in humans in 1982. RAS is a family of oncogenes that are present in all cells in the body and were the first oncogenes identified in human cancer cells.1 Oncogenes work as an on/off switch for cell division, and RAS mutations affect this switch, not allowing the cells to switch off and causing them to grow uncontrollably, leading to the development of cancer.

“In normal cells, the RAS gene is under very tight control in terms of how it behaves, but in the cancer cell, when it’s mutated, it becomes out of control. It’s independently sending signals to the nucleus to not only make cells divide and proliferate without any control, but also to spread and evade the effects of anticancer drug therapy,” Philip A. Philip, MD, PhD, explained in an interview. Philip is leader of GI and Neuroendocrine Oncology, and vice president of Medical Affairs at the Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Center in Detroit.



There are three RAS genes in humans: KRAS, HRAS, and NRAS. Mutations within KRAS are found more often in human cancers than are mutations within HRAS or NRAS.1 Stephen et al wrote in 2014 that KRAS mutations may be more effective in oncogenesis than HRAS and NRAS because of its structure. Only KRAS has “stemlike properties” on certain cell types. KRAS also seems to be critical in development.1 Mice that were lacking KRAS died during formation of the embryos, while those that did not have HRAS or NRAS did not die at that stage. KRAS is found to be more frequently altered in solid tumors: 95% of pancreatic cancers, 45% of colorectal cancers, and 35% of lung cancers, according to the NCI (Figure). By contrast, NRAS is found to be more frequently altered in hematological cancers: 30% of acute myeloid leukemias and 15% of melanomas. HRAS is found to be altered in 15% of bladder cancer.

RAS oncogenes are the worst oncogenes,” Frank McCormick, PhD, FRS, DSc (Hon), national program advisor for the NCI’s RAS Initiative, has said. McCormick is a professor emeritus at UCSF Hellen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center in San Francisco.

The Research Bandwagon

When RAS mutations were initially discovered, there was a flurry of research into new drug possibilities, but these did not lead to effective treatments. Initially, there was hope that farnesyltrans- ferase inhibitors (FTIs) were the answer. However, testing found that, although FTIs did block HRAS, the strategy did not prove effective in phase II trials for lung and pancreatic cancers, or in phase III trials for colorectal and pancreatic cancers.2

“There were some clinical trials in the early 2000s that did not succeed,” Hook said. Researchers found that the RAS protein already had an escape mechanism, she explained, and that the cells had found a way to get around the drugs.


View Conference Coverage
Online CME Activities
TitleExpiration DateCME Credits
Cancer Summaries and Commentaries™: 2016 Conference Coverage: Advances in the Treatment of Genitourinary CancersApr 29, 20172.5
Community Practice Connections™: 20th Annual International Congress on Hematologic Malignancies®: Focus on Leukemias, Lymphomas and MyelomaMay 24, 20172.0
Publication Bottom Border
Border Publication