Dr Feldman on Updated Findings From the TRANSCEND CLL 004 Trial in CLL/SLL

Commentary
Video

In Partnership With:

Tatyana Feldman, MD, discusses updated safety and efficacy data from the phase 1/2 TRANSCEND CLL 004 trial in patients with relapsed/refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia or small lymphocytic lymphoma.

Tatyana Feldman, MD, hematologist, director, T Cell Lymphoma Program, John Theurer Cancer Center, Hackensack University Medical Center, discusses updated safety and efficacy data from the phase 1/2 TRANSCEND CLL 004 trial (NCT03331198) in patients with relapsed/refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) or small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL).

The single-arm, multicenter study investigated the efficacy of the CAR T-cell therapy lisocabtagene maraleucel (Breyanzi; liso-cel) in patients with CLL/SLL who experienced disease progression on both a BTK inhibitor and a venetoclax (Venclexta)–based regimen.

Findings from the primary analysis of this study were previously reported and demonstrated rapid and deep responses with the agent at a median follow-up of 21.1 months (range 0.4-55.6). These data supported the FDA's decision to grant priority review to the supplemental biologics license application seeking the expanded indication of liso-cel to include patients with CLL and SLL who had prior exposure to a BTK inhibitor and a BCL2 inhibitor.

A longer median follow-up analysis was conducted in the primary efficacy analysis set, Feldman begins. This population featured a subset of patients who had experienced disease progression following treatment with a BTK inhibitor and BCL2 inhibitor and received liso-cel at a target dose of 100 x 106 CAR+ T cells. At a median follow-up of 23.5 months (range, 0.4-59.6), patients experienced a complete response rate of 20% (95% CI, 10.0%-33.7%) with liso-cel, Feldman reports.

Additionally, the agent elicited sustained undetectable minimal residual disease rates in both blood (64%; 95% CI,45.2%-77.1%) and bone marrow (60%; 95% CI,45.2%-73.6%), she states. The overall response rate with the agent was 44% (95% CI, 30.0%-58.7%), and the median duration of response was 35.3 months (range, 11.01-not reached), Feldman adds. A signal for overall survival benefit was also observed, although further data are needed to confirm this finding, Feldman notes.

Regarding safety, the study reported manageable adverse effects with liso-cel, Feldman continues. There was an 85% incidence of any-grade cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and a 45% incidence of non-CRS neurological events. Importantly, most of these events were low grade, indicating the agent’s favorable safety profile, she says.

Overall, results show that liso-cel may serve as a valuable addition to the treatment armamentarium for this patient subset, and investigators anticipate the agent's expanded approval in both CLL and SLL, Feldman concludes.

Related Videos
Jeremy M. Pantin, MD, clinical director, Adult Transplant and Cellular Therapy Program, TriStar Centennial Medical Center, bone marrow transplant physician, Sarah Cannon Research Institute
Maria Hafez, MD, assistant professor, breast and sarcoma medical oncologist, director, Clinical Breast Cancer Research, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University
Zeynep Eroglu, MD
Sundar Jagannath, MBBS, director, Center of Excellence for Multiple Myeloma, professor of medicine (hematology and medical oncology), The Tisch Cancer Institute, Mount Sinai
Akriti Jain, MD
Raj Singh, MD
Gottfried Konecny, MD
Karim Chamie, MD, associate professor, urology, the University of California, Los Angeles
Mike Lattanzi, MD, medical oncologist, Texas Oncology
Ramez N. Eskander, MD