Commentary

Video

Dr Leypoldt on the Use of Isa-KRd in Newly Diagnosed, High-Risk Multiple Myeloma

Lisa Leypoldt, MD, discusses findings from the phase 2 GMMG-CONCEPT trial in patients with multiple myeloma.

Lisa Leypoldt, MD, clinician and researcher, Department of Oncology, Hematology and Bone Marrow Transplantation with Department of Pneumology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, and a postdoctoral research fellow, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, discusses findings from the phase 2 GMMG-CONCEPT trial (NCT03104842) in patients with multiple myeloma.

The phase 2 trial evaluated the addition of isatuximab-irfc (Sarclisa) to carfilzomib (Kyprolis), lenalidomide (Revlimid), and dexamethasone (Isa-KRd) in transplant-eligible (n = 127) and transplant-ineligible (n = 26) patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma with high-risk disease. High-risk disease was defined as having International Staging System stage II/III risk with deletion 17p, translocation (4;14), or translocation (14;16), or more than three 1q21 copies. Transplant-eligible patients received 6 cycles of Isa-KRd induction before transplant, followed by 4 cycles of Isa-KRd consolidation plus Isa-KR as maintenance therapy for 2 years. Transplant-eligible patients also received high-dose melphalan. Transplant-ineligible patients received an additional 2 cycles of Isa-KRd cycles during induction.

The primary end point of the study was minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity levels below 10−5 per next-generation flow at the end of consolidation. The secondary end point was progression-free survival (PFS), Leypoldt says.

Findings from the interim analysis demonstrated that the MRD-negativity rates after consolidation were 67.7% and 54.2% in transplant-eligible and transplant-ineligible patients, meeting the primary end point of the study, (P = .004; P = .012), respectively. Moreover, 81.8% and 69.2% of transplant-eligible and transplant-ineligible patients achieved MRD negativity at any time point, respectively, Leypoldt says. Moreover, MRD negativity was sustained for more than 1 year in 62.6% and 46.2% of transplant-eligible and transplant-ineligible patients, respectively.

Encouragingly, at a median follow-up of 44 months in transplant-eligible patients and 33 months in transplant-ineligible patients, median PFS and median overall survival were not reached in either arm, Leypoldt says. The 1-, 2-, and 3-year PFS rates were 86.4% (95% CI, 80.5%-92.6%), 78.3% (95% CI, 71.4%-85.9%), and 68.9% (95% CI, 61.2%-77.7%) in transplant-eligible patients and 75.1% (95% CI, 59.7%-94.5%), 62.6% (95% CI, 46.0%-85.3%), and 58.4% (95% CI, 41.7%-81.9%) in transplant-ineligible patients. These outcomes are promising for such a high-risk patient population, Leypoldt concludes.

Related Videos
Binod Dhakal, MD
Ajay K. Nooka, MD, MPH, FACP
Meletios A. Dimopoulos, MD
Binod Dhakal, MD
In this final episode of OncChats: Optimizing the Use of Bispecific Antibodies in Myeloma and Beyond, Drs Usmani and Wasil, discuss plans for developing guidelines and policies to enhance management of bispecific T-cell engagers across various centers.
In this episode of OncChats: Optimizing the Use of Bispecific Antibodies in Myeloma and Beyond, Drs Usmani and Wasil discuss the need for continued evaluation of prophylactic treatments like tocilizumab (Actemra) and antimicrobial measures for bispecific T-cell engagers, noting logistical and financial challenges and the importance of collaboration with community centers.
In this episode of OncChats: Optimizing the Use of Bispecific Antibodies in Myeloma and Beyond, Drs Usmani and Wasil emphasize the need for comprehensive patient education, effective communication, and specific safety protocols to manage patients receiving bispecific T-cell engagers.
In this episode of OncChats: Optimizing the Use of Bispecific Antibodies in Myeloma and Beyond, Drs Usmani and Wasil discuss the challenges and strategies in managing bispecific T-cell engagers in the realm of cancer, emphasizing the importance of community and tertiary care collaboration to handle unique toxicities like cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and the need for well-defined protocols to ensure patient safety and effective treatment.
In this episode of OncChats: Optimizing the Use of Bispecific Antibodies in Myeloma and Beyond, Drs Usmani and Wasil discuss bispecific T-cell engagers, highlighting their effectiveness in treating hematologic malignancies like multiple myeloma, their potential use in solid tumors, and the importance of managing unique adverse effects, such as cytokine release syndrome and infection risks.
Jill Corre, PharmD, PhD