Dr. Mesa on Ruxolitinib Vs Fedratinib in Myelofibrosis Treatment

Video

Ruben Mesa, MD, discusses the use of ruxolitinib versus fedratinib in treating patients with myelofibrosis.

Ruben Mesa, MD, the director of the Mays Cancer Center at UT Health San Antonio MD Anderson Cancer Center, discusses the use of ruxolitinib (Jakafi) versus fedratinib (Inrebic) in treating patients with myelofibrosis.

Ruxolitinib has been the approved frontline therapy of choice for several years. The FDA approval of fedratinib immediately impacts patients who did not have an optimal response to ruxolitinib or those who lost their response and may benefit moving on to a different agent, explains Mesa.

Currently, there are no head-to-head data on fedratinib versus ruxolitinib. Both had positive phase III studies, but the agents have slightly different toxicity profiles that need to be considered. Fedratinib may benefit subsets of patients with significant splenomegaly or more advanced myelofibrosis, according to Mesa. Each agent will find its niche in frontline therapy as time goes on, Mesa concludes.

Related Videos
Mike Lattanzi, MD, medical oncologist, Texas Oncology
Vikram M. Narayan, MD, assistant professor, Department of Urology, Emory University School of Medicine, Winship Cancer Institute; director, Urologic Oncology, Grady Memorial Hospital
Stephen V. Liu, MD
S. Vincent Rajkumar, MD
Pashtoon Murtaza Kasi, MD, MS
Naseema Gangat, MBBS
Samilia Obeng-Gyasi, MD, MPH,
Kian-Huat Lim, MD, PhD
Saurabh Dahiya, MD, FACP, associate professor, medicine (blood and marrow transplantation and cellular therapy), Stanford University School of Medicine, clinical director, Cancer Cell Therapy, Stanford BMT and Cell Therapy Division
Muhamed Baljevic, MD