Dr. Tyson on Rationale For Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Bladder Cancer

Video

In Partnership With:

Mark D. Tyson, MD, urologic oncologist, Mayo Clinic, discusses 2 trials that have shaped physicians’ opinions on the use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with bladder cancer.

Mark D. Tyson, MD, urologic oncologist, Mayo Clinic, discusses 2 trials that have shaped physicians’ opinions on the use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with bladder cancer.

A Medical Research Council trial showed the benefit of 3 cycles of cisplatin, methotrexate, and vinblastine in the neoadjuvant setting for patients receiving radiation, surgery, or radiation plus surgery. That trial showed 6% significance 8 years into the trial.

The SWOG 8710 trial was much more compelling. There was a 31-month survival benefit for patients in the surgical subset who received neoadjuvant methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin and cisplatin (MVAC). The patients in the T3 subset experienced a 40-month benefit.

Tyson states that there’s most likely a beneficial effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Whether or not physicians should give gemcitabine and cisplatin or dose-dense MVAC, and the correct number of cycles is still up for debate. Toxicity management still remains a challenge, especially in MVAC.

Related Videos
Mike Lattanzi, MD, medical oncologist, Texas Oncology
Vikram M. Narayan, MD, assistant professor, Department of Urology, Emory University School of Medicine, Winship Cancer Institute; director, Urologic Oncology, Grady Memorial Hospital
Stephen V. Liu, MD
S. Vincent Rajkumar, MD
Pashtoon Murtaza Kasi, MD, MS
Naseema Gangat, MBBS
Samilia Obeng-Gyasi, MD, MPH,
Kian-Huat Lim, MD, PhD
Saurabh Dahiya, MD, FACP, associate professor, medicine (blood and marrow transplantation and cellular therapy), Stanford University School of Medicine, clinical director, Cancer Cell Therapy, Stanford BMT and Cell Therapy Division
Muhamed Baljevic, MD