Tripathy Offers Perspective on HER2-Positive Breast Cancer

Christina Izzo
Published Online: Wednesday, August 13, 2014
Debu Tripathy, MD

Debu Tripathy, MD

The ever-evolving treatment landscape for patients with HER2-positive breast cancer leaves several questions unanswered regarding therapeutic sequences and whether an optimal standard of care exists. To provide further perspective on current paradigms, OncLive interviewed Debu Tripathy, MD, a breast cancer expert whose clinical research efforts focus on novel therapeutics, resistance, and the discovery of biomarkers.

Tripathy, a professor of medicine and the co-leader of the Women's Cancer Program at the University of Southern California Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, serves as the primary investigator for the Systematic Therapies for HER2-positive Metastatic Brest Cancer Study (SystHERs), which hopes to provide information on treatment patterns across the United States.

OncLive: The SystHERs registry hopes to answer several questions, can you describe this study?

Tripathy: The SystHERs registry study is a registry that is enrolling patients who have been diagnosed with HER2/neu-positive metastatic breast cancer within the last 6 months. It’s an effort to collect detailed information on patients who are diagnosed with HER2 metastatic breast cancer to look both at the demographic factors as well as their past history: when they’ve presented with early stage disease, what treatment they got. The registry also looks at what treatment they receive in the metastatic setting, what their outcomes are in terms of response and side effects.

One thing that’s important about this registry is that we don’t have information as to how patients are treated and followed after their diagnosis. We have data from individual trials, which covers them through one course of treatment, but to put together the whole picture regardless of what their treatments are is really not known. And now that there are new agents to treat metastatic breast cancer in the HER2-positive setting we need a better handle on how patients do in the long time course, because clinicians need to face complicated treatment decisions in patients who have had a variety of different prior treatments.

And so what we are looking to do with this registry is to be able to analyze long-term information. We intend to enroll 1000 patients and we intend to follow patients for 8 years so we will have a lot of longitudinal data.

What will be the important take-away points from SystHERs?

Well, the reason that we are looking at this is to look at how patients do through a sequence of therapies as opposed to just one individual course, which is what the clinical trials address. This project will also look at the rarer toxicities that may not be apparent from the individual trials but might surface in a larger trial that has longer follow up.

We also want to look at how decisions are made for both toxicity and treatment. We want to gather patient-reported outcomes, which is another feature of this registry. We give patients questionnaires about the quality of life and the symptoms they’re having. This is also something that we don’t have a lot of information on.

Finally, we are asking patients to consent to submit blood as well as tissue from previous surgeries and biopsies so that we will be able to look at biomarkers as well.

What are the current frameworks used for decision-making and sequencing for patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer?

There are some broad frameworks that physicians use based on the trials but many patients don’t fall into the broad frameworks and may not fit very easily into a particular decision algorithm.

For example, we now know that in the first-line setting, for patients who have not had any previous trastuzumab or had adjuvant trastuzumab over a year ago, the best treatment as far as we can tell from clinical trials is a combination of trastuzumab and docetaxel or possibly other taxanes. While many patients may fit into that category, the question is “what do you do next when they progress?”

We know that T-DM1 is superior to other therapies such as capecitabine and lapatinib, which used to be the prior standard, but again, what do you do when a patient progresses in a very short period of time? And then what do you do after second-line therapy? What do you do in the third, fourth, and fifth-line setting? There we have very little guidance so we can go by data from phase II trials and if you look at the NCCN recommendations, for example, they will cover a handful of combinations. But there really is no way to know which is best for any given situation.

Is preoperative therapy the standard of care for HER2-positive disease?

Online CME Activities
Free CME from PER
Community Practice Connections: 13th Annual International Congress on the Future of Breast Cancer®
Highlights From the 13th Annual International Congress on the Future of Breast Cancer®
Pancreatic Cancer: Novel and Emerging Approaches to Early Detection and Treatment
Oncology Best Practice: Challenges in Treating Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia – The Older Patient and Comorbid Conditions
More Reading
$auto_registration$