Clinical Considerations for Immuno-oncology (IO) Sequencing in Advanced Endometrial Cancer

Panelists discuss how the integration of immunotherapy, particularly immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and combination therapies, is transforming the treatment landscape of advanced endometrial cancer (EC), with a focus on biomarker-driven approaches and the ongoing role of chemotherapy.

Panelists discuss how treating patients with advanced endometrial cancer (EC) who progress after immune-oncology (IO)-chemotherapy involves reassessing tumor biomarkers, considering alternative immunotherapies or targeted treatments, and personalizing care based on prior treatment responses and individual patient factors.

Panelists discuss how the decision to continue or discontinue immune-oncology (IO) therapy in subsequent lines of treatment for advanced endometrial cancer (EC) is influenced by factors such as tumor response, biomarker status, treatment tolerability, patient health, and the availability of alternative therapies.

Panelists discuss how treatment decisions for advanced endometrial cancer (EC) patients after progressing on immune-oncology (IO) therapy are guided by clinical trial data, real-world evidence, biomarker status, initial therapy response, and patient-specific factors to personalize subsequent treatment strategies.

Panelists discuss how a patient's prior treatment history, including response to previous therapies, toxicity, biomarker status, and clinical trial participation, plays a critical role in determining subsequent therapy for advanced endometrial cancer (EC).

Panelists discuss how real-world studies on immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer (EC) provide valuable insights into treatment effectiveness, patient outcomes, and the management of adverse events, helping refine treatment strategies, especially for biomarker-driven therapy.

Panelists discuss how the pembrolizumab-lenvatinib combination offers promising efficacy as a second-line therapy for patients with mismatch repair deficiency (dMMR) endometrial cancer (EC) who did not respond to pembrolizumab monotherapy, with an emphasis on biomarker-driven treatment decisions, managing toxicity, and the need for further studies to refine patient selection and treatment strategies.

Panelists discuss how recent studies highlight the potential of second-line immunotherapy approaches, including the pembrolizumab-lenvatinib combination and re-challenging with second-line immunotherapy, to improve outcomes in advanced endometrial cancer (EC), with an emphasis on biomarker-driven strategies, careful monitoring for toxicity, and the need for further research to optimize treatment sequencing and patient selection.