What did the secondary and subgroup analyses show?
In a post hoc analysis adjusted for HRD status and prior PARP inhibitor use, restricted mean survival time at 22 months showed a 2.5-month difference favoring arm C over arm A (95% CI, 0.1-4.9; exploratory P = .043).
In the secondary comparison of arm C vs arm B, the median PFS with olaparib plus durvalumab was 7.4 months (95% CI, 5.5-8.6; HR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.51-1.14), with PFS events in 37 patients (77%) in arm B.
In subgroup analyses of arm C vs arm A, the HR for PFS was 0.73 (95% CI, 0.58-0.92) in patients with HRD-negative disease (n = 104) and 1.19 (95% CI, 0.74-1.89) in those with HRD-positive disease (n = 36). The HR was 0.81 (95% CI, 0.65-1.01) in patients without prior PARP inhibitor exposure (n = 116) and 0.95 (95% CI, 0.58-1.54) in those with prior PARP inhibitor exposure (n = 24).
What did the safety analysis show?
The safety population included 45 patients in arm A, 46 in arm B, and 92 in arm C; 5 patients who received no treatment were excluded. Median treatment durations were 5.7 months (range, 1.0-27.8), 7.4 months (range, 1.6-36.2), and 8.3 months (range, 0.5-36.1), respectively.
Adverse effects (AEs) of any grade occurred in 89%, 100%, and 99% of patients in arms A, B, and C, respectively. Grade 3/4 AEs occurred in 16%, 48%, and 39%, and serious AEs in 11%, 50%, and 49%; no grade 5 AEs were reported. The most common grade 3/4 AE was anemia across arms (11%, 7%, and 10%, respectively); in arm C, decreased neutrophil count (8%), decreased white blood cell count (5%), and decreased platelet count (5%) were also reported.
Olaparib was interrupted in 36%, 52%, and 50% of patients and dose reduced in 24%, 43%, and 47%, respectively. Durvalumab was interrupted in no patients in arm B and 4% of patients in arm C, and at least 1 UV1 dose was omitted in 11% of patients in arm C.
Compared with olaparib alone, both durvalumab-containing arms were associated with increased toxicity. Adding UV1 to durvalumab plus olaparib increased only vaccination complications, headache, and flu-like symptoms.
What are the next steps for DOVACC?
Although DOVACC did not meet its primary end point, the investigators concluded that the subgroup signal in HRD-negative and PARP inhibitor–naive disease warrants further evaluation of cancer vaccines in ovarian cancer. Translational research using tissue and blood samples collected from patients in the academic trial is planned to investigate additional treatment outcome measures, resistance mechanisms, and patient selection.
Other vaccine-based maintenance strategies are also under study in this setting. In the phase 2 GINECO-OV244b/ENGOT-ov58/TEDOVA trial (NCT04713514), the neo-epitope vaccine OSE2101 plus pembrolizumab (Keytruda) improved PFS vs best supportive care as maintenance therapy in patients with platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer previously treated with a PARP inhibitor and bevacizumab.2
References
- Nøttrup TJ, Lindemann K, Heitz F, et al. First results from the randomised ENGOT-OV56/NSGO-CTU-DOVACC trial investigating olaparib, durvalumab and UV1 vaccination as maintenance therapy for patients with BRCA-wildtype recurrent ovarian cancer. Presented at: 2026 ESMO Congress; October 23-27, 2026; Madrid, Spain. Abstract LBA39.
- OSE2101 plus pembrolizumab as maintenance boosts PFS in platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer. OncLive. Published September 15, 2026. Accessed October 23, 2026. https://www.onclive.com/view/ose2101-plus-pembrolizumab-as-maintenance-boosts-pfs-in-platinum-sensitive-ovarian-cancer