OS in the population of patients with FGFR2b expression of at least 10% served as the primary end point. Key secondary end points included PFS and overall response rate (ORR) in patients with FGFR2b expression of at least 10%, as well as safety in all randomly assigned patients.
What additional efficacy data were seen in FORTITUDE-101?
Rha explained that the patient baseline characteristics were well balanced between the 2 arms.
Further efficacy findings showed that the addition of bemarituzumab to mFOLFOX6 significantly improved PFS but not ORR. Among patients with FGFR2b overexpression in at least 10% of tumor cells, at a median follow-up of 11.1 months, the median PFS was 8.6 months (95% CI, 7.5-9.5) in the bemarituzumab arm vs 6.7 months (95% CI, 5.6-7.6) in the placebo arm (HR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.53-0.95; 2-sided P = .019). The ORRs in these respective arms were 45.9% (95% CI, 38.0%-54.0%) and 44.8% (95% CI, 37.1%-52.8%; 2-sided P = .90). The median DORs in these respective arms were 7.0 months (95% CI, 5.3-7.3) and 5.8 months (95% CI, 5.0-7.3).
What was the safety profile of bemarituzumab in FORTITUDE-101?
At the June 20, 2025, cutoff date, the median duration of bemarituzumab treatment in the safety analysis set was 22 weeks (range, < 1-136), and the median duration of placebo was 25 weeks (range, < 1-154). The median durations of mFOLFOX6 treatment in these respective arms were 25 weeks (range, < 1-148) and 23 weeks (range, < 1-154).
Treatment-emergent adverse effects (TEAEs) in the bemarituzumab and placebo arms, respectively, were classified as:
- Any grade (> 99% vs 98%)
- Grade 3 or higher (90% vs 79%)
- Leading to treatment interruption (68% vs 40%)
- Leading to treatment withdrawal (28% vs 6%)
Treatment-related AEs in the bemarituzumab and placebo arms, respectively, were classified as:
- Any grade (> 89% vs 66%)
- Grade 3 or higher (60% vs 18%)
- Leading to treatment interruption (52% vs 12%)
- Leading to treatment withdrawal (24% vs 1%)
- Fatal (0% vs < 1%)
The most common any-grade TEAEs (≥ 25% of patients) seen with bemarituzumab included reduced visual acuity, punctuate keratitis, anemia, neutropenia, nausea, corneal epithelial defect, and dry eye. The most common grade 3 or higher TEAEs were reduced visual acuity (bemarituzumab arm, 33%; placebo arm, 0%); corneal events, including punctuate keratitis (26%; < 1%), corneal epithelium defect (14%; 0%), limbal stem cell deficiency (14%; < 1%), ulcerative keratitis (8%; 0%); and non-corneal events, including neutropenia (31%; 30%), decreased neutrophil count (9%; 9%), anemia (9%; 11%), stomatitis (7%; 1%), and fatigue (5%; 3%).
Notably, among patients who received bemarituzumab and had at least 17 weeks of ocular follow-up, 90% of grade 3 or higher corneal AEs resolved to grade 1 or lower. Corneal AEs had delayed onset and gradual resolution; however, resolution of visual acuity happened quicker. The median time to onset of grade 3 or higher corneal AEs was 24 weeks, and the median time to resolution was 17 weeks, with a 70% resolution rate. The median time to onset of visual acuity reduction was also 24 weeks; however, the median time to resolution was 8 weeks, and the resolution rate was 83%.
“Results from this trial and the upcoming [phase 3] FORTITUDE-102 study [NCT05111626] will further characterize the benefit-risk profile of bemarituzumab in FGFR2b-positive gastric cancer,” Rha concluded.
FORTITUDE-102 is investigating bemarituzumab plus mFOLFOX6 or CAPOX (capecitabine and oxaliplatin) and nivolumab (Opdivo) vs placebo plus mFOLFOX6 or CAPOX in patients with previously untreated advanced gastric/GEJ cancer with FGFR2b overexpression.3
Disclosures: Rha reported having consulting or advisory roles with Amgen, Arcus Biosciences, Astellas Pharma, AstraZeneca, BI, BeOne, Daiichi Sankyo, Indivumed, Jazz, LG Chem, MSD Oncology, Ono, and Toray; participating in speaker’s bureaus for Amgen, Arcus Biosciences, Astellas Pharma, AstraZeneca, BMS/Ono, Daiichi Sankyo, Eisai, and MSD Oncology; and receiving research funding from with Amgen, Astellas Pharma, AstraZeneca, Bayer, BeOne, BI, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Daiichi Sankyo, Eisai, Indivumed, Eli Lilly, Jazz, MSD Oncology, Roche/Genentech, Sillajen, and Taiho.
References
- Rha SY, Cid RP, Montes AF, et al. Bemarituzumab (BEMA) plus chemotherapy for advanced or metastatic FGFR2b-overexpressing gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer (G/GEJC): FORTITUDE-101 phase 3 study results. Presented at: 2025 ESMO Congress. October 17-21, 2025; Berlin, Germany. Abstract LBA10.
- Wainberg ZA, Kang YK, Lee KW, et al. Bemarituzumab as first-line treatment for locally advanced or metastatic gastric/gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma: final analysis of the randomized phase 2 FIGHT trial. Gastric Cancer. 2024;27(3):558-570. doi:10.1007/s10120-024-01466-w
- Bemarituzumab plus chemotherapy and nivolumab versus chemotherapy and nivolumab for FGFR2b overexpressed untreated advanced gastric and gastroesophageal junction cancer. (FORTITUDE-102). ClinicalTrials.gov. Updated October 1, 2025. Accessed October 20, 2025. https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05111626