Adjuvant T-DXd vs T-DM1 in DESTINY-Breast05: Highlights
- T-DXd reduced the risk of invasive disease recurrence or death by 53% (HR, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.34-0.66; P < .0001).
- The 3-year IDFS rate was 92.4% with T-DXd vs 83.7% with T-DM1.
- Any-grade adjudicated drug-related interstitial lung disease occurred in 9.6% of patients receiving T-DXd vs 1.6% of those receiving T-DM1.
What additional efficacy findings were reported in DESTINY-Breast05?
Fifty-one IDFS events occurred with T-DXd vs 102 with T-DM1. The IDFS benefit with T-DXd was observed across prespecified patient subgroups, including patients with inoperable disease at presentation (HR, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.27-0.63), those with positive nodes after neoadjuvant therapy (HR, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.29-0.62), and Asian patients (HR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.30-0.93). Notably, the 95% CIs crossed 1 in the operable-disease subgroup (HR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.34-1.01) and in patients with negative post-neoadjuvant nodes (HR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.33-1.59).
The 3-year DFS rate was 92.3% (95% CI, 89.5%-94.3%) with T-DXd vs 83.5% (95% CI, 79.9%-86.4%) with T-DM1 (HR, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.34-0.66; P < .0001). Distant recurrence was the first event in 42 patients receiving T-DXd vs 77 patients receiving T-DM1, including CNS recurrence in 17 patients vs 25 patients, respectively. The 3-year DRFI rates were 93.9% (95% CI, 91.4%-95.7%) vs 86.1% (95% CI, 82.5%-89.1%), respectively (HR, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.34-0.71), and the 3-year BMFI rates were 97.6% (95% CI, 96.2%-98.5%) vs 95.8% (95% CI, 93.6%-97.2%), respectively (HR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.35-1.17).
What safety findings were observed with T-DXd in DESTINY-Breast05?
Among treated patients (T-DXd arm, n = 806; T-DM1 arm, n = 801), grade 3 or higher treatment-emergent adverse effects (TEAEs) occurred in 50.6% vs 51.9%, and serious TEAEs were reported in 17.4% vs 13.6%. Discontinuation due to TEAEs was more common with T-DXd (17.9% vs 12.9% with T-DM1), as were dose interruptions (49.6% vs 41.1%, respectively). More than 72% of patients in each arm completed all 14 cycles of treatment.
Nausea was the most frequent any-grade TEAE with T-DXd (71.3% vs 29.3% with T-DM1), whereas decreased platelet counts were more common with T-DM1 (49.8% vs 21.2% with T-DXd). Any-grade adjudicated drug-related interstitial lung disease occurred in 9.6% of patients receiving T-DXd, most commonly grade 2 (6.5%), with grade 3 events reported in 0.9% of patients and 2 grade 5 events reported (0.2%).
What is the global regulatory status of T-DXd following neoadjuvant therapy for HER2-positive breast cancer?
In May 2026, the FDA approved T-DXd for adult patients with HER2-positive (IHC 3+ or ISH-positive) breast cancer and residual invasive disease after neoadjuvant HER2-targeted therapy, at a dose of 5.4 mg/kg every 3 weeks for up to 14 cycles.3 This regulatory decision was backed by findings from DESTINY-Breast05.
The adjuvant T-DXd indication is also approved in Brazil, Canada, and India, and is under review in the European Union, Japan, and Switzerland.¹
References
- Enhertu approved in China as adjuvant treatment for patients with residual disease after neoadjuvant treatment for HER2 positive early breast cancer. News release. Daiichi Sankyo. October 8, 2026. Accessed October 8, 2026. https://www.daiichisankyo.com/files/news/pressrelease/pdf/202610/20261008_E1.pdf
- Geyer CE, Park YH, Shao ZM, et al. Trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) vs trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) in patients (pts) with high-risk human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–positive (HER2+) primary breast cancer (BC) with residual invasive disease after neoadjuvant therapy (tx): interim analysis of DESTINY-Breast05. Ann Oncol. 2025;36(suppl 2):S1556-S1557. doi:10.1016/j.annonc.2025.09.021
- FDA approves two separate indications for fam-trastuzumab deruxtecan-nxki in HER2-positive early-stage breast cancer. FDA. May 15, 2026. Accessed May 15, 2026. https://www.fda.gov/drugs/resources-information-approved-drugs/fda-approves-two-separate-indications-fam-trastuzumab-deruxtecan-nxki-her2-positive-early-stage