"Chronic irAEs can negatively affect HRQOL, mental health, and the ability to work," lead study author Sophie Merrick, MBCHB, MRCP, PhD, of the UCL Innovative Clinical Trials Unit of the Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, at the University College London in the United Kingdom, and coauthors wrote in the publication.
How was the substudy designed?
The investigator-led RAMPART platform trial evaluated adjuvant durvalumab with or without tremelimumab vs active monitoring in patients with resected RCC at intermediate or high risk of relapse. At the primary analysis, durvalumab plus tremelimumab significantly improved disease-free survival (DFS) vs active monitoring, whereas durvalumab monotherapy did not.1,2 Pembrolizumab (Keytruda) has improved DFS and overall survival in resected clear cell RCC, and the investigators noted that HRQOL is increasingly central to benefit-risk assessments of adjuvant immunotherapy.1
Eligible patients received durvalumab at 1500 mg every 4 weeks for 1 year (arm B) or the same durvalumab schedule plus tremelimumab at 75 mg on day 1 and at week 4 (arm C), and had completed at least 2 EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaires. Patients were purposively sampled across age, gender, ethnicity, trial arm, toxicity experience, and recurrence status.
The median age was 57 years (range, 41-76); 14 patients were men, 9 were women, all identified as White, and 4 had experienced recurrence.
Semi-structured interviews (online, n = 14; telephone, n = 7; in-person, n = 2) lasted a median of 40 minutes (range, 25-78) and were analyzed using the framework method. Recommendations were refined at a workshop with 10 interviewed patients and then reviewed by a multidisciplinary expert panel.
What are the implications of substudy on trial design and survivorship care?
The investigators recommended that immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) trials report toxicity grade together with irAE duration, resolution, and any need for lifelong treatment, and that HRQOL be assessed with validated ICI-specific patient-reported outcomes analyzed at the domain level rather than with global scores alone. Existing instruments such as the EORTC QLQ-C30 were developed before the immunotherapy era and may miss toxicities such as arthralgia, they noted.
Adjuvant Durvalumab-Based Therapy in RCC: RAMPART HRQOL Substudy
- Patients weighed the duration and chronicity of irAEs more heavily than their severity when describing HRQoL impact.
- Fatigue, diarrhea, and arthralgia were the most burdensome persistent symptoms; adrenal insufficiency carried a particular mental health toll.
- Work type, financial security, and caregiving shaped the burden; supportive relationships and structured follow-up mitigated it.
In clinical practice, the authors called for clear ownership of long-term toxicity management across oncology, primary care, and specialty teams; written follow-up plans with a designated contact; tailored exercise and rehabilitation programs; proactive psychological support; and practical measures such as remote appointments and early financial advice.
What were the limitations of the RAMPART substudy?
Limitations included the UK-only cohort and a lack of ethnic diversity; only 6 (3%) of the 220 eligible patients identified as Asian (n = 5) or Black (n = 1). The sample was selected to capture a breadth of toxicity experiences and does not reflect irAE incidence in RAMPART, and the long recall period may have affected accuracy.
References
1. Merrick S, South A, Frangou E, et al. Health-related quality of life with adjuvant immune checkpoint inhibition in renal cell carcinoma: a qualitative study of UK participants in the phase III RAMPART trial. PLoS One. 2026;21(9):e0358789. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0358789
2. Adjuvant Durvalumab Plus Tremelimumab Shows DFS Advantage Over Active Monitoring in Resected RCC. OncLive. Published May 30, 2026. Accessed October 15, 2026. https://www.onclive.com/view/adjuvant-durvalumab-plus-tremelimumab-shows-dfs-advantage-over-active-monitoring-in-resected-rcc