What was the design of SHINE?
CRs Linked to Prolonged PFS Regardless of Treatment With Ibrutinib vs Placebo Plus BR
- Patients in the ibrutinib arm (n = 261) achieved a CR rate of 65.5% compared with 57.6% in the placebo arm (n = 262).
- The median PFS for patients who achieved a CR was 97.8 months (95% CI, 89.5-not evaluable) in the ibrutinib arm and 87.9 months (95% CI, 76.4-91.6) in the placebo arm.
- Both time to next treatment and OS data were higher among patients who achieved a CR regardless of treatment arm.
The trial enrolled patients who were at least 65 years old with a centrally confirmed diagnosis of MCL that was previously untreated and documented as stage 2 to 4 disease.2 Patients also needed to have a measurable site of disease that was at least 1.5 cm in diameter, adequate organ function, and an ECOG performance status of 0 or 1.
If patients had planned stem cell transplantation, a history of stroke or intercranial hemorrhages or a cardiovascular disease that was clinically significant 6 months prior to screening, they were not included in the trial.2,3
Eligible patients were randomly assigned to receive either a once daily, 560-mg dose of oral ibrutinib or placebo, in combination with bendamustine at 90 mg/m2 body surface area on days 1 and 2 of each 28-day cycle and rituximab at 375 mg/m2 body surface area on day 1 of each cycle.1
Patients who achieved a CR or PR after 6 cycles of treatment continued to receive rituximab maintenance therapy once every 8 weeks for up to 12 additional doses. Treatment continued until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
The trial’s primary end point was PFS; secondary end points included CR, time to next treatment, overall survival (OS), objective response rate and minimal residual disease.3
In the current analysis, patients across both arms had a median age of 71 years and were mostly male (68.2% in ibrutinib arm; 71% in placebo arm).2 Slightly more patients in each arm had an ECOG performance status of 0 (51.3%; 53.8%), and the majority of patients had extranodal bone marrow involvement (75.9%; 76.3%). Patients had a simplified mantle cell lymphoma international prognostic index (sMIPI) status of intermediate risk (47.5%; 49.1%), high risk (35.6%; 26.3%) or low risk (16.8%; 17.6%).
What were the additional data for ibrutinib plus bendamustine and rituximab from the analysis?
Investigators noted that similar trends in improved time to next treatment and OS following a CR were observed in the analysis.
Patients in the ibrutinib arm who achieved a CR, PR, and SD or PD had a median treatment duration of 43.17 months (range, 0.7-106.2), 9.69 months (range, 0.9-96.96) and 1.51 months (range, 0.2-3.2), respectively. In the placebo arm, median total treatment duration was were 55.92 months (range, 1.7-100.1), 13.86 months (range, 1.3-97.1) and 2 months (range, 0-12) in patients who achieved CR, PR, and SD or PD, respectively.
“The results of this post-hoc analysis suggest that CR is associated with better long-term disease control and improved survival outcomes in MCL,” Mishima added.
References
- Mishima Y, Hashimoto D, Ichii M, et al. Impact of best response to ibrutinib plus bendamustine and rituximab on PFS in MCL: a secondary analysis of SHINE. Ann Hematol. 2025;104:4605–4610. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00277-025-06569-7
- Wang M, Jurczak W, Jerkeman M, et al. Ibrutinib plus bendamustine and rituximab in untreated mantle-cell lymphoma. N Engl J Med. 2022;386(26):2482-2494. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2201817
- A study of the Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase inhibitor ibrutinib given in combination with bendamustine and rituximab in patients with newly diagnosed mantle cell lymphoma. Clinicaltrials.gov. Updated July 8, 2025. Accessed February 12, 2026.