Dose-reduction guidance has been incorporated into ibrutinib prescribing information, and the clinical interest in tolerability-driven approaches reflects the substantial treatment burden documented in this population, particularly among older patients.²
The study included patients with previously untreated CLL, and they were evaluated for TP53 status at screening.1 Patients were not allowed to have significant cadiovascular history, uncontrolled hypertension, or an ECOG performance status higher than 2.
After physicians determined that patients were appropriate to receive ibrutinib plus venetoclax, patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to the reactive (cohort 1A) and proactive (cohort 1B) dose-adjustment regimens. Patients were dosed per the approved label for 12 cycles of fixed-duration therapy following a 3-cycle lead-in with ibrutinib at 420 mg daily. Venetoclax step-up and dosing followed the label. In Cohort 1B, the ibrutinib dose was proactively reduced to 280 mg daily after the lead-in.
The primary end point was ORR, tested individually for each cohort against the greater-than-75% benchmark. Secondary end points included PFS, OS, and safety.
As of November 2025, 95.3% of patients in Cohort 1A and 94.1% in Cohort 1B remained on study, while 1.2% in each cohort had completed treatment.
TAILOR Primary Analysis at a Glance
- Reactive dose adjustment (cohort 1A) produced an ORR of 94.2% (95% CI, 87%-98%).
- Proactive dose adjustment to ibrutinib 280 mg daily (cohort 1B) produced an ORR of 89.4% (95% CI, 81%-95%).
- Both cohorts reported low rates of atrial fibrillation and no cardiac deaths.
What were the additional efficacy and safety findings?
Both cohorts demonstrated consistent treatment benefit in ORR across patient subgroups, including patients with del(17p)/TP53 aberrations.
In cohort 1A, any-grade and grade 3 or higher treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were reported in 95.3% and 48.2% of patients, respectively; after the ibrutinib lead-in, these respective rates were 91.8% and 41.2%. AEs led to ibrutinib discontinuation in 4.7% of patients and ibrutinib dose reduction in 20.0%. One death, due to intracranial hemorrhage, was deemed related to ibrutinib. AEs of interest included infections and infestations (51.0%), arthralgia (21.2%), hypertension (10.6%), and atrial fibrillation (4.7%).
In cohort 1B, any-grade and grade 3 or higher TEAEs were reported in 94.1% and 50.6% of patients, respectively; after the ibrutinib lead-in, these respective rates were 83.5% and 42.4%. AEs led to ibrutinib discontinuation in 11.8% of patients and ibrutinib dose reduction in 11.8%. One death, due to pneumonia during the lead-in, was reported. AEs of interest included infections and infestations (31.8%), arthralgia (17.6%), hypertension (16.5%), and atrial fibrillation (8.2%).
References
- Ghia P, Novak J, Mihalyova J, et al. Safety and efficacy of dose-modified approaches of fixed-duration ibrutinib+venetoclax in patients with previously untreated CLL: primary analysis of the prospective phase 2 TAILOR study. Presented at: 2026 EHA Congress; June 11-14, 2026; Stockholm, Sweden. Abstract PF606.
- Real-world analysis shows substantial treatment burden in older patients with CLL/SLL. OncLive. Published June 17, 2026. Accessed June 22, 2026. https://www.onclive.com/view/real-world-analysis-shows-substantial-treatment-burden-in-older-patients-with-cll-sll