Patients with nonsquamous histology received 500 mg/m2 of pemetrexed plus carboplatin at an area under the curve (AUC) 5 every 3 weeks for 4 cycles, plus optional pemetrexed maintenance. Patients with squamous histology received 200 mg/m2 of paclitaxel plus carboplatin at AUC 6 every 3 weeks for 4 cycles.
The primary end points in the safety run-in phase were DLTs and adverse effects (AEs), and AEs and the number of patients discontinuing treatment because of an AE in the expansion phase. Secondary end points were ORR and duration of response.
Baseline characteristics revealed that the mean and median ages were 67 (standard deviation, 10) and 68 (range, 23-83) years, respectively. Most patients were male (75%), prior smokers (64%), and had nonsquamous histology (66%). PD-L1 TPS was at least 50% in 36% of patients, between 1% and 49% in 41%, less than 1% in 22%, and missing in 1% of cases.
During the safety run-in, 6 patients with nonsquamous and 7 with squamous histology were enrolled. In dose expansion, 33 patients with nonsquamous and 13 with squamous histology were enrolled. “The frequency of AEs was similar across both the run-in and expansion phases and across both histologies,” Gralla said.
What Was the Efficacy of the Regimen According to PD-L1 TPS?
Among patients with PD-L1 TPS below 1% (n = 11), between 1% and 49% (n = 21), and 50% or greater (n = 17), the ORRs were 55% (95% CI, 23%-83%), 62% (95% CI, 38%-82%), and 71% (95% CI, 44%-90%), respectively. Of note, the PD-L1 expression level was missing for one patient who achieved a partial response.
What Events Defined the Safety Profile of the Regimen?
AEs that occurred in at least 20% of patients (n = 59) included fatigue (61.0%), nausea (45.8%), neutropenia (42.4%), anemia (40.7%), constipation (33.9%), diarrhea (32.2%), dizziness (30.5%), thrombocytopenia (29.1%), dyspnea (25.4%), decreased appetite (23.7%), headache (23.7%), hypotension (23.7%), pyrexia (23.7%), vomiting (22.0%), weight decrease (22.0%), and hypokalemia (20.3%). The safety events were largely related to the chemoimmunotherapy regimen, Gralla said.
Treatment-emergent AEs occurred in 94.9% of patients. Grade 3 AEs occurred in 71.2% of patients, and serious AEs occurred in 42.4%. A total of 6.8% of patients had AEs that led to death, but none were treatment related; 3.4% of AEs led to discontinuation. Cytokine release syndrome occurred in 11.9% of patients (grade 1, 8.5%; grade 2, 3.4%).
What Are the Next Steps for the Regimen in This Patient Population?
“Overall observed tolerability and preliminary clinical activity in the TeLuRide-005 study support further development of this novel treatment regimen for participants with advanced NSCLC,” Gralla concluded.
Disclosures: Gralla disclosed research support from the NIH/NCI R01 CA157409, Merck, and Eikon; participation in advisory boards for Eli Lilly and AstraZeneca; and no stock ownership.
References
- Costin D, Meshad M, Jotte R, et al. TeLuRide-005: phase 2 study of EIK1001, a toll-like receptor 7/8 co-agonist with pembrolizumab + chemotherapy as first-line therapy in stage 4 non-small cell lung cancer. Presented at: 2025 ESMO Congress; October 17-25, 2025; Berlin, Germany. Abstract 1850MO.
- A phase 2 study of EIK1001 in combo with pembrolizumab and chemotherapy in patients with stage 4 NSCLC. ClinicalTrials.gov. Updated April 10, 2025. Accessed October 20, 2025. https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06246110