Key Findings From the Phase 2 Trial (NCT06427213)
- Zanubrutinib plus rituximab, with or without BAC, achieved an 100% ORR and ORRCR rate is exceeding 84% in newly diagnosed MCL.
- Promising efficacy outcomes wereas observed in elderly patients and younger patients with high-risk features, including TP53 mutations.
- Safety profiles of both regimens were manageable, with no grade 3/4 adverse effects reported in the elderly cohort.
What was the study design?
The study was divided into 2 cohorts: an elderly cohort (n = 21) of patients 65 years or older and a younger, high-risk cohort (n = 20) of patients no older than 65 years with at least 1 of the following high-risk features: a TP53 mutation, blastoid/pleomorphic variant, or high-risk Simplified Mantle Cell Lymphoma International Prognostic Index (MIPI) score ranging from 6 to 11.
In the elderly cohort, patients received 160 mg of oral zanubrutinib twice daily plus 375 mg/m2 of rituximab on day 1 for 12, 28-day cycles. In the younger cohort, patients received 6 cycles of zanubrutinib and rituximab at the same dose and schedule, plus 70 mg/m2 of bendamustine on days 2 and 3 and 500 mg/m2 of cytarabine on days 2 through 4 of each cycle. Transplant-eligible patients proceeded to ASCT. Transplant-ineligible patients as well as elderly patients in the former cohort went on to receive 160 mg of zanubrutinib as maintenance until progressive disease.
The primary end point was CR rate following induction therapy. Secondary end points included ORR after induction, CR rate mid-way through induction, minimal residual disease (MRD)–negativity rate after induction, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), treatment-related adverse effects (AEs), and patient quality of life.
What were the demographics and baseline characteristics?
A total of 23 patients were enrolled between October 2023 and May 2025, and 22 were evaluable for efficacy in the older cohort (n = 9) and younger, high-risk cohort (n = 13). In the older cohort the median age was 71 years (range, 66-82) and most patients were male (n = 7; 77.8%). A MIPI score of 6 or greater, bone marrow involvement, and Ki-67 levels above 30% were each documented in 4 patients (44.4%).
In the younger, high-risk cohort the median age was 59 years (range, 43-63) and most patients were male (n = 11; 84.6%). A MIPI score of 6 or greater, bone marrow involvement, and Ki-67 levels above 30% was seen in 53.8% (n = 7), 84.6% (n = 11), and 53.8% (n = 7) of patients, respectively.
What other efficacy outcomes were shared?
PFS and OS were not statistically significant, with P values of 0.32 and 1.00, respectively.
When looking at outcomes among the two cohorts, the 1-year PFS and OS rates were 85.7% and the 100%, respectively, in the older cohort. The median follow-up was 11.5 months. In the younger, high-risk cohort the 1-year PFS and OS rates were both 100%. The median follow-up was 10.7 months.
With respect to durability in the all-comer population, the median duration of response (DOR) was not reached; the 6-month DOR rate was 81.8% (n = 18).
How did the safety profiles stack up in these 2 cohorts?
“Grade 3/4 AEs occurred mainly in the younger, high-risk cohort, including neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, anemia, and pneumonia, [and were mainly] R-BAC related and manageable. No grade 3/4 AEs occurred in elderly patients. Common grade 1/2 AEs included arrhythmia and rash,” the authors stated.
In the older cohort, AEs included leukopenia (grade 1, 11.1%), skin infection (grade 2, 11.1%), rash (grade 2, 11.1%), cardiac arrhythmia (grade 2, 11.1%), leukopenia (grade 1, 22.2%), and thrombocytopenia (grade 1, 11.1%). In the younger, high-risk cohort, AEs included leukopenia (grade 2, 7.7%; grade 4, 15.4%), pneumonia (grade 3, 23.1%), myelosuppression (grade 4, 7.7%), lymphopenia (grade 4, 38.5%), rash (grade 2, 15.4%), anemia (grade 2, 7.7%; grade 3, 23.1%), thrombocytopenia (grade 2, 15.4%; grade 3, 15.4%; grade 4, 7.7%), and neutropenia (grade 1, 7.7%; grade 2, 7.7%; grade 4, 38.5%).
“For younger, high-risk patients, zanubrutinib combined with R-BAC showed encouraging efficacy and high MRD negativity rates in a small cohort, suggesting its potential to improve prognosis and showing promise as a first-line treatment option for this population,” the authors concluded.
Disclosures: No disclosures were listed for Zhang.
References
- Zhang Q, Wu Y, Jiao Q, et al. Efficacy and safety of zanubrutinib-containing regimens in patients with newly diagnosed mantle cell lymphoma: interim results from a phase II investigator-initiated study. Blood. 2025;146(suppl 1):1823. doi:10.1182/blood-2025-1823
- FDA grants accelerated approval to zanubrutinib for mantle cell lymphoma. FDA. Updated November 15, 2019. Accessed January 5, 2026. https://www.fda.gov/drugs/resources-information-approved-drugs/fda-grants-accelerated-approval-zanubrutinib-mantle-cell-lymphoma
- U.S. FDA approves tablet formulation of BeOne’s Brukinsa for all approved indications. News release. BeOne. June 11, 2025. Accessed January 5, 2026. https://ir.beonemedicines.com/news/us-fda-approves-tablet-formulation-of-beones-brukinsar-for-all-approved-indications/644dc063-4114-48b8-9636-c60cb6cc6bd1