If patients had received prior therapy with ibrutinib or other BTK inhibitors, or had a history of central nervous system lymphoma, they were not included in the trial.3
Patients received once-daily oral, 560-mg doses of ibrutinib and 400-mg doses of venetoclax for up to 24 months.1 Combination dosages were then followed by ibrutinib monotherapy until disease progression, unacceptable toxicities, or withdrawal occurred.
The trial’s primary end point was CR rate per independent review committee. Secondary endpoints were ORR, DOR, undetectable minimal residual disease in patients with CR, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety.
Baseline characteristics for patients in the FAS population revealed that patients had a median age of 71 years (range, 59-81) and were mostly male (77%). All patients had relapsed MCL. Most patients had received 2 prior lines of therapy (54%), whereas fewer patients had received 3 or more (31%) or 1 (15%) prior line of therapy. Most patients had an ECOG performance status of 0 (85%), with fewer having a performance status of 1 (15%). The types of MCL histology included typical, blastoid, pleomorphic, and other, which occurred at rates of 54%, 23%, 15%, and 15%, respectively. Finally, slightly more patients had low tumor lysis syndrome risk (54%) compared with high risk (46%).
What were the additional efficacy and safety data with ibrutinib plus venetoclax in the M20-075 trial?
The 12-month PFS rates for patients in the trial were 83.3% (95% CI, 48.2%-95.6%) and 84.6% (95% CI, 51.2%-95.9%) for the PPS and FAS populations, respectively. Furthermore, the 36-month PFS rates in each population were 75.0% (95% CI, 40.8%-91.2%) and 69.2% (95% CI, 37.3%-87.2%). The 12- and 36-month OS rates in the FAS population were 84.6% (95% CI, 51.2%-95.9%) and 76.9% (95% CI, 44.2%-91.9%), respectively.
Regarding safety, across all patients in the trial, common any-grade hematological treatment-emergent adverse effects (TEAEs) were neutropenia, leukopenia, anemia, and thrombocytopenia, which occurred at respective rates of 54%, 38%, 31%, and 31%. Diarrhea, constipation, pyrexia, and skin infections were other common any-grade nonhematological TEAEs in the trial, experienced in 54%, 38%, 38%, and 31% of patients, respectively. Common grade 3 or higher TEAEs among patients were neutropenia (46%), leukopenia (23%), COVID-19 pneumonia (15%), anemia (8%), and pyrexia (8%).
Only 1 patient discontinued the study agents due to a TEAE (squamous cell carcinoma of the lung, which was deemed unrelated to study treatment). In total, 38% of patients had ibrutinib dose reductions due to TEAEs, and 54% of patients discontinued venetoclax due to TEAEs. Finally, 62% of patients had either ibrutinib or venetoclax dose interruptions due to TEAEs.
“Longer exposure to venetoclax with this combination regimen demonstrated a predictable and well-tolerated safety profile,” Goto and coauthors added.
References
- Goto H, Ito S, Kizaki M, et al. Long-term outcomes of venetoclax and ibrutinib in Japanese patients with relapsed/refractory mantle cell lymphoma. Int J Clin Oncol.2025;30:2352-2361. doi:10.1007/s10147-025-02865-4
- Goto H, Ito S, Kizaki M, et al. Phase 2 study of ibrutinib plus venetoclax in Japanese patients with relapsed/refractory mantle cell lymphoma. Int J Clin Oncol. 2024;29:232-240. doi:10.1007/s10147-023-02443-6
- Study to assess effect of oral venetoclax tablet in combination with oral ibrutinib capsule on best overall response of complete response in adult Japanese participants with relapsed/refractory mantle cell lymphoma. ClinicalTrials.gov. Updated July 9, 2025. Accessed February 11, 2026. https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04477486