What were the topline results from MANEUVER?
The results were compelling. The ORR at week 25 was 54% in the therapeutic arm vs 3.2% in the placebo arm [P < .0001], and the TVS reduction was concordant and robust. Importantly, patient-centered outcomes, which are critical in studies like this, improved in a clinically meaningful way. There was a significant reduction in pain and stiffness, as well as improvements in range of motion and overall function. These end points are critical in orthopedic oncology, where preserving joint function is central; much of what we are doing is about quality of life as much as life itself.
From a safety standpoint, the adverse effect [AE] profile was consistent with the CSF-1R inhibitor class. Common toxicities included liver enzyme elevations, some edema, and hair color changes, but overall, the drug was considered manageable in this population. Mechanistically, TGCT is driven by the overexpression of CSF-1, leading to the recruitment of macrophages that constitute the bulk of the tumor mass. Inhibiting the CSF-1 receptor disrupts this signaling axis and reduces the tumor-associated macrophage burden, which explains both the radiographic and clinical responses observed.
Why are these findings clinically significant?
These findings build on [data with] prior [systemic] agents such as pexidartinib [Turalio], and more recently, vimseltinib [Romvimza] and suggest a potentially improved therapeutic index with a highly selective CSF-1R inhibitor. This fundamentally changes our treatment paradigm. Instead of viewing these patients as surgical problems with limited options, we can now integrate systemic therapy to downstage disease, improve symptoms, and, in some cases, avoid or even defer surgery. It’s exciting to me as a surgeon as well as an academic oncologist.
If approved, what role do you foresee for pimicotinib in the treatment paradigm and what considerations are most important to keep in mind?
All these decisions need to be made by a multidisciplinary team. It is not the surgeon or the medical oncologist in isolation; in fact, physical therapists and other allied providers are important in the decision-making. Multiple agents are now available, and some patients do very well on current therapies. If it isn’t broken, don’t fix it; the latest and greatest doesn’t mean you should necessarily switch a patient off a prior agent if they are doing well with it, because these drugs are wonderful in certain patients but have AEs in others. As patients are started on treatment, some of these newer agents will be chosen because the specificity and mechanistic biology are getting increasingly refined.
The overall specificity and mechanistic biology is getting more refined with the newer agents. As patients are started on treatment, some of these newer agents will be chosen [over] legacy agents because of that precision. [However…,] if patients are currently on prior agents and they’re tolerating [treatment], keep them on it.
Does the introduction of systemic agents earlier in the paradigm indicate an upcoming shift in treatment goals for TGCT?
Those of us who see enough of these patients are really backing away from up-front surgical management for diffuse TGCT. For nodular TGCT, there is still a role for surgery. Having said that, for advanced, bulky disease, most of us with [substantial] experience are backing away from offering surgery up front. We will still do much of the surveillance and the checkpoints regarding when to [implement] a drug holiday or intervene with surgery in a discretionary way.
Some of these patients are in the prime of their life for the most part, and they want to be active. There may be times where people [who] are weekend warriors or competitive athletes [with a] big event coming up say, “Maybe I should have an arthroscopy to clean that up, because I really want a 3-month window where my disease burden is well controlled.” [In that case], we stop the drug and potentially [recommend] a surgical intervention.
All of this is very nuanced, which brings me back to that fundamental tenet: It needs to be a combined effort from a multidisciplinary team. When patients see a provider about this, the most important question they can ask is, “Are you part of a team that discusses these sorts of cases?”
References
- Gelderblom H, Ravi V, Martin-Broto J, et al. Extended efficacy and safety from the phase III MANEUVER trial of pimicotinib in patients with tenosynovial giant cell tumour (TGCT). Ann Oncol. 2025;36(suppl 2):S1340-S1341. doi:10.1016/j.annonc.2025.08.3301
- Abbisko Therapeutics announces FDA acceptance of the NDA for pimicotinib for the treatment of tenosynovial giant cell tumor. News release. Abbisko Therapeutics Co Ltd. January 13, 2026. Accessed May 6, 2026. https://www.abbisko.com/newsDetail/234.html
- Pimicotinib significantly improved outcomes for patients with TGCT in phase III trial. News release. Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany. November 12, 2024. Accessed May 6, 2026. https://www.emdserono.com/us-en/company/news/press-releases/pimicotinib-topline-results-12-11-2024.html