
Mayo Clinic Experimental Dual-Drug Nanotherapy Crosses the Blood-Brain Barrier and Improved Survival in Preclinical Glioblastoma Models
Key Takeaways
- Liposomal nanoparticles were designed to traverse the blood–brain barrier and deliver everolimus/rapamycin plus vinorelbine to the same glioblastoma cells concurrently.
- Orthotopic, patient-derived glioblastoma models showed survival gains, with dual-drug nanotherapy plus radiation exceeding a twofold improvement versus untreated controls.
Mayo Clinic researchers developed an experimental nanotherapy that delivers two cancer drugs directly to brain tumors.
The nanotechnology-based approach packages two existing cancer drugs into tiny particles engineered to cross the brain's protective blood-brain barrier and target tumor cells. In preclinical models using patient-derived tissue, combining the treatment with radiation more than doubled survival compared with untreated controls.
Glioblastoma is notoriously difficult to treat. Patients typically survive for about 15 months after diagnosis, even with the
The new approach uses small lipid-based particles, known as liposomes, to carry and deliver a combination of drugs — everolimus or rapamycin and vinorelbine — directly to cancer cells, using a new tumor-targeting strategy. By ensuring both drugs reach the same cells at the same time, researchers aim to improve tumor-killing effects while reducing the toxic side effects associated with higher drug doses.
"Glioblastoma remains extremely difficult to treat due to drug resistance and limited drug delivery to the brain," says
The drug combination includes agents that interfere with tumor growth pathways and disrupt the cancer's ability to repair DNA damage, making tumors more sensitive to radiation.
"This represents a promising direction for treating patients with glioblastoma and advancing new technologies and therapies, so we can one day improve the survival of patients with brain cancer by delivering novel cancer therapies to the brain," says
Researchers are conducting additional safety and dosing studies required before clinical trials can begin. If successful, the approach could eventually be an oral or intravenous medication used alongside standard treatments or as an option for patients whose tumors do not respond to existing therapies.
"While this work is still in development, it represents an important step toward developing more precise cancer treatments that are both more effective and less toxic, potentially improving quality of life for patients," says Dr. Mukhopadhyay.
This study was supported in part by the National Institutes of Neurologic Disorders and Stroke of the National Institutes of Health under award number R01NS129671. Read the







































































