2 Clarke Drive
Cranbury, NJ 08512
© 2022 MJH Life Sciences™ and OncLive - Clinical Oncology News, Cancer Expert Insights. All rights reserved.
Olaparib demonstrated clinically meaningful benefit 1 year after standard of care therapies, such as surgery, chemotherapy, hormone therapy, or radiation therapy, in patients with BRCA1/2-mutant, early HER2-negative breast cancer who are at a high risk for recurrence.
Olaparib (Lynparza) demonstrated clinically meaningful benefit 1 year after standard of care therapies, such as surgery, chemotherapy, hormone therapy, or radiation therapy, in patients with BRCA1/2-mutant, early HER2-negative breast cancer who are at a high risk for recurrence, according to data from the phase 3 OlympiA trial (NCT02032823).1
Results from the multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled trial, which were presented during a virtual press briefing ahead of the 2021 ASCO Annual Meeting, indicated that after a median follow-up of 2.5 years, patients who received olaparib experienced a 42% reduction in invasive disease-free survival (iDFS), including local and metastatic recurrence of breast cancer, other new cancers, and death due to any cause, (Hazard ratio [HR], 0.58; 99.5% CI, 0.41-0.82; P <.0001). Additionally, investigators noted a difference in 3-year iDFS rate between olaparib and placebo of 8.8% (95% CI, 4.5%-13.0%; stratified HR, 0.58; 99.5% CI, 0.41-0.82; P <.0001).
“The OlympiA study is the first to report the benefits of [an adjuvant] PARP inhibitor for early forms of germline BRCA1/2–mutation associated cancer,” presenting study author Andrew Tutt, MB, ChB, PhD, FMedSci, head of the Division of Breast Cancer Research, director of the Breast Cancer Now Toby Robins Research Centre, a clinician scientist with the Laboratory and Clinical Trials programme, and consultant clinical oncologist at the Institute of Cancer Research, said. “Patients who received olaparib after surgery and chemotherapy were more likely to be alive without cancer, [as well as] avoid metastasis than the patients who received placebo.”
Patients with HER2-negative early breast cancer who harbor a BRCA1/2 mutation, which are present in approximately 5% of all breast cancers, are at a high risk of disease recurrence. Although outcomes have been positive for patients with these mutations who have received standard treatments such as surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy, the risk of recurrence remains high for some patients. As such, additional novel targeted therapies are needed in order to reduce the risk of recurrence in this patient population.
Olaparib is a PARP inhibitor that targets DNA repair defects in certain germline-mutant cancers and was previously approved by the FDA in January 2018 for the treatment of patients with germline BRCA-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer. As such, investigators sought to examine the agent in patients with germline BRCA–mutated, HER2-negative early breast cancer.
The trial enrolled 1836 patients with HER2-negative breast cancer harboring a germline BRCA mutation who were randomized 1:1 to receive either 300 mg of oral olaparib (n = 921) twice daily for 1 year or placebo (n = 915). Additionally, patients needed to have been treated for early stage (stage II-III) breast cancer and have completed surgery and chemotherapy, with or without radiotherapy. Inclusion criteria also required that patients have a high risk of disease recurrence. Those who had received prior treatment with a PARP inhibitor were not eligible to enroll.2
The primary end point for the study was iDFS, while secondary end points included distant disease-free survival (DDFS), overall survival (OS), health-related quality of life, and safety.
“Stringent criteria were applied for a planned interim analysis,” Tutt said. “At this analysis, OlympiA’s Independent Data Monitoring Committee found [that] these stringent criteria were met for early reporting.”
Additional findings indicated that after a median follow-up of 2.5 years, patients who were treated with olaparib experienced a 43% reduction in DDFS, including metastatic disease, new cancer, and death due to any cause (HR, 0.57; 99.5% CI, 0.39-0.83; P <.0001). The difference in 3-year DDFS rate between olaparib and placebo was 7.1% (95% CI, 3.0%-11.1%; stratified HR, 0.57; 99.5%, 0.39-0.83; P <.0001).
At the time of the early primary end point report, OS data were considered immature. However, while fewer deaths were reported in patients receiving olaparib vs placebo, OS was not significantly different between the 2 study cohorts at a median follow up of 2.5 years (HR, 0.68; 99% CI, 0.44-1.05; P = .024). Moreover, the difference in 3-year OS rate between the 2 arms was 3.7% (95% CI, 0.3%-7.1%).
In terms of the safety profile, the adverse effects (AEs) reported in the olaparib group were consistent with what has been previously reported with the agent. Additionally, Olaparib did not increase serious AEs, including hospital admissions or occurrences of other cancers such as leukemia. However, grade 3 or higher AEs were reported more often in patients receiving treatment with olaparib, and included anemia (9%), neutropenia (5%), leukopenia (3%), and fatigue (2%).
The most common AEs of any grade reported in patients who received olaparib included nausea (57%), fatigue (40%), anemia (23%), vomiting (23%), and headache (20%). Moreover, the most common any grade AEs in the placebo arm were fatigue (27%), nausea (23%), headache (17%), diarrhea (14%), and arthralgia (12%).