News|Articles|September 12, 2026

Ris-Rez Extends Median OS to 18.5 Months vs Topotecan in Relapsed SCLC

Author(s)OncLive Staff
Listen
0:00 / 0:00

Key Takeaways

  • Overall survival improved by 8.2 months with ris-rez versus topotecan, with fewer death events at interim analysis and consistent benefit across chemotherapy-free interval, brain metastases, and stage strata.
  • Blinded central review demonstrated superior disease control: PFS HR 0.33, ORR 58.3%, DCR 90.4%, and modestly longer DOR (6.9 vs 5.6 months).
SHOW MORE

Risvutatug rezetecan (ris-rez; HS-20093/GSK5764227) significantly improved overall survival (OS) versus topotecan in patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC) that progressed after first-line platinum-based therapy, according to primary results from a preplanned interim analysis of the phase 3 ARTEMIS-008 trial (NCT06498479) presented at the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer (IASLC) 2026 World Conference on Lung Cancer (WCLC).1

Median OS was 18.5 months with ris-rez (n = 230) versus 10.3 months with topotecan (n = 231), for a stratified HR of 0.46 (95% CI, 0.35 - 0.62; P < .0001) at a median follow-up of 12.2 months. OS events had occurred in 33.5% and 52.4% of patients, respectively, and investigators reported a consistent OS benefit across all predefined subgroups.

The median progression-free survival (PFS) by blinded independent central review (BICR) was 7.2 months with ris-rez versus 3.0 months with topotecan (HR, 0.33; 95% CI, 0.25 - 0.42), and the BICR-assessed objective response rate (ORR) was 58.3% (95% CI, 51.6 - 64.7) versus 12.6% (95% CI, 8.6 - 17.5).

The disease control rate (DCR) was 90.4% (95% CI, 85.9 - 93.9) versus 60.2% (95% CI, 53.5 - 66.5), and the median duration of response (DOR) was 6.9 months (95% CI, 5.6 - 8.2) versuss 5.6 months (95% CI, 3.0 - 8.3), respectively.

"Ris-Rez demonstrated a statistically significant and clinically meaningful overall survival benefit over topotecan in patients with SCLC that progressed after platinum-based therapy, with a favorable safety profile," lead study author Jie Wang, MD, PhD, professor at the National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, said in a news release issued by the IASLC.2 "These results suggest the potential of ris-rez to define a new standard of care in relapsed SCLC."

ARTEMIS-008 Trial Design

SCLC exhibits high expression of the immune checkpoint protein B7-H3, which is associated with reduced survival. Ris-rez comprises a human anti–B7-H3 IgG1 monoclonal antibody conjugated at cysteine residues to the topoisomerase I inhibitor payload rezetecan (HS-9265) via a cleavable linker, with a drug-to-antibody ratio of approximately 4.

In the phase 1 ARTEMIS-001 trial (NCT05276609), the agent produced a confirmed ORR of 52.3% and a median OS of 13.0 months in heavily pretreated patients with extensive-stage SCLC. The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) granted ris-rez orphan drug designation for SCLC in December 2025,3 and the sponsor announced in July 2026 that ARTEMIS-008 had met its primary OS end point.4

ARTEMIS-008 was one of 2 phase 3 trials assessing B7-H3–directed ADCs versus topotecan in relapsed SCLC presented in the same WCLC plenary session. In TAISHAN-302 (NCT06612151), tambotatug pelitecan produced a median OS of 13.3 months versus 9.4 months with topotecan (HR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.35 - 0.62) in a similar Chinese patient population.5

ARTEMIS-008 Design

The multicenter, open-label study enrolled patients ≥18 years old with SCLC that relapsed after first-line platinum-based therapy and an ECOG performance status of 0 or 1. A total of 461 patients in China were randomly assigned 1:1 to intravenous ris-rez at 8.0 mg/kg every 3 weeks or topotecan at 1.2 mg/m2 on days 1 - 5 every 3 weeks, stratified by chemotherapy-free interval (<90 vs ≥90 days), baseline brain metastases, and disease stage at study entry. Treatment continued until disease progression or another discontinuation criterion was met.

The primary end point was OS; secondary end points included PFS, ORR, DCR, and DOR, plus safety. The interim OS analysis was preplanned at 192 events, representing 75% of the 256 events required for the final analysis.

Baseline characteristics were balanced. Median age was 61.5 years in the ris-rez arm and 63.0 years in the topotecan arm. All patients were Asian, 83.5% and 82.3% were male, and 80.9% and 84.8% had an ECOG performance status of 1. Extensive-stage disease at study entry was present in 87.0% and 87.9% of patients, 82.6% and 79.2% had received a prior PD-(L)1 inhibitor, 36.1% and 36.8% had a chemotherapy-free interval of less than 90 days, 19.1% and 19.9% had brain metastases, and 21.3% and 27.7% had liver metastases. Median duration of exposure was 6.9 months with ris-rez versus 2.8 months with topotecan.1

ARTEMIS-008 Highlights

  • Median OS was 18.5 months vs 10.3 months (HR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.35-0.62; P< .0001) at the preplanned interim analysis.
  • BICR-assessed median PFS was 7.2 versus 3.0 months (HR, 0.33), and BICR-assessed ORR was 58.3% versus 12.6%.
  • Grade 3 or higher TRAEs occurred in 60.9% versus 78.2% of patients; treatment-related deaths occurred in 1.3% versus 0.9%.
  • ILD events occurred in 11.7% vs 1.9% of patients, with grade 3 events in 3.9% versus 0.9% and no grade 4 or 5 events.

Investigator-assessed outcomes were consistent with BICR findings. Median PFS was 7.8 months with ris-rez versus 4.0 months with topotecan (HR, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.28 - 0.45). Complete responses by BICR occurred in 4 patients (1.7%) receiving ris-rez, with the remaining responses being partial; no complete responses were reported with topotecan.

Safety Profile

Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) of any grade occurred in 100% of patients in both the ris-rez (n = 230) and topotecan (n = 216) arms. Grade ≥3 TRAEs occurred in 60.9% versus 78.2%, serious TRAEs in 34.3% versus 37.5%, TRAEs leading to dose delay in 38.3% versus 39.8%, TRAEs leading to dose interruption in 11.3% vs 0.5%, TRAEs leading to dose reduction in 20.4% versus 38.0%, and TRAEs leading to treatment discontinuation in 9.1% versus 4.2%.

Three patients (1.3%) in the ris-rez arm died of TRAEs — pneumonia, septic shock, and Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia in 1 patient each — versus 2 (0.9%) in the topotecan arm, from septic shock with respiratory failure and from myelosuppression.

The most common grade ≥3 TRAEs in both arms were hematologic, including decreased neutrophil, white blood cell, lymphocyte, and platelet counts and anemia.1,2

Interstitial lung disease (ILD) events occurred in 27 patients (11.7%) receiving ris-rez versuss 4 (1.9%) receiving topotecan; grade ≥3 events occurred in 3.9% versus 0.9%, and no grade 4 or 5 ILD events were reported.

Investigators concluded that ris-rez had a favorable safety profile with no new safety signals and that the data support the ongoing global phase 3 EMBOLD-SCLC-301 trial (NCT07099898) in patients with relapsed SCLC.

References

  1. Wang J, Wang L, Duan J, et al. Risvutatug rezetecan vs topotecan in relapsed SCLC: primary results of phase 3 ARTEMIS-008. Presented at: International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer (IASLC) 2026 World Conference on Lung Cancer; September 12-15, 2026; Seoul, South Korea. Abstract PL02.04.
  2. Phase III ARTEMIS-008 trial shows risvutatug rezetecan significantly improves overall survival in relapsed small-cell lung cancer. News release. International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer. September 13, 2026. Accessed September 13, 2026.
  3. FDA Grants Orphan Drug Designation to Risvutatug Rezetecan for SCLC. OncLive. Published December 11, 2025. Accessed September 13, 2026. https://www.onclive.com/view/fda-grants-orphan-drug-designation-to-risvutatug-rezetecan-for-sclc
  4. Risvutatug Rezetecan Shows OS Benefit Over Topotecan in Relapsed SCLC. OncLive. Published July 10, 2026. Accessed September 13, 2026. https://www.onclive.com/view/risvutatug-rezetecan-shows-os-benefit-over-topotecan-in-relapsed-sclc
  5. Tam-Peli Reduces Risk of Death by 54% vs Topotecan in Relapsed Small Cell Lung Cancer. OncLive. Published September 13, 2026. Accessed September 13, 2026. https://www.onclive.com/view/tam-peli-reduces-risk-of-death-54-vs-topotecan-relapsed-sclc

Related to this article