The European Commission has approved the subcutaneous administration route and pharmaceutical form of pembrolizumab (pembrolizumab and berahyaluronidase alfa; Keytruda SC) for all adult indications of the intravenous (IV) form of pembrolizumab (Keytruda) in the European Union.1
Comparable efficacy results with subcutaneous pembrolizumab vs IV pembrolizumab in patients with metastatic non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) from the phase 3 3475A-D77 trial (NCT05722015) informed the European Commission’s decision. The primary analysis of the trial solidified subcutaneous administration of pembrolizumab (n = 251) as noninferior to pembrolizumab IV (n = 126), with the overall response rate (ORR) in the subcutaneous pembrolizumab arm being 45% (95% Cl, 39%-52%) vs 42% (95% Cl, 33%-51%) in the pembrolizumab IV arm.1,2 Efficacy results for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) had no differences between patients in each arm of the trial. Furthermore, the geometric mean ratio (GMR) for cycle 1 at AUC0-6 weeks was 1.14 (96% CI, 1.06-1.22; P < .0001), and the GMR for steady-state Ctrough was 1.67 (94% CI, 1.52-1.84; P < .0001).2
“We are honored to introduce [subcutaneous pembrolizumab], the first and only subcutaneous immune checkpoint inhibitor in Europe that can be administered in 1 minute every 3 weeks or in 2 minutes every 6 weeks,” Marjorie Green, MD, senior vice president and head of Oncology and Global Clinical Development at Merck Research Laboratories, stated in a news release.1 “We are committed to discovering patient-focused innovations for people with cancer, like [subcutaneous pembrolizumab], which offers faster administration than [IV pembrolizumab], 2 dosing options, and allows patients more choices of health care settings where they can receive therapy.”
The subcutaneous method of administration implements medications under the skin, enabling administration times that can be as little as 1 minute. The technology offers convenience to patients since they can receive medications through subcutaneous administration in a larger range of settings like community clinics, rather than purely at infusion centers. Moreover, subcutaneous administration offers patients whose veins are hard to access for IV infusion a more accessible method of receiving treatment.