Key Takeaways From a Phase 2 Study of Tagraxofusp/Azacitidine/Venetoclax
- This triplet regimen was found to be feasible in both previously untreated and relapsed/refractory BPDCN.
- The regimen’s safety profile was as-expected and was deemed comparable to that of the triplet regimen in prior evaluations in AML.
- Composite CR rates with the triplet in previously untreated and relapsed/refractory patient populations were 88% and 64%, respectively.
What was the rationale for evaluating this triplet regimen both upfront and in the relapsed/refractory setting?
“We previously found in the laboratory that tagraxofusp resistance in AML and BPCDN is mediated by DNA methylation and silencing of diphthamide genes, which are necessary for the cytotoxicity of diphtheria toxin, and that tagraxofusp resistance can be reversed with azacitidine treatment,” Lane explained. “We've also shown that BPDCN is highly dependent on BCL2 and sensitive to venetoclax.”
Lane also noted clinical data from a phase 1b study (NCT03113643), which evaluated the safety of tagraxofusp plus azacitidine with or without venetoclax in AML. Results showed that 69% of patients with first-line AML who received the triplet (n = 26) achieved a best response of CR, 19% achieved a CRi, and 12% achieved a morphologic leukemia-free state. The median time to best response among these 18 patients was 55 days. Furthermore, there was no indication of increased toxicity with tagraxofusp with azacitidine with or without venetoclax in combination, and adverse effects (AEs) related to tagraxofusp were also as expected.
How was this phase 2 trial designed?
This phase 2 study enrolled patients 18 years of age or older with previously untreated or relapsed/refractory BPDCN onto separate cohorts. Patients were required to have albumin levels of 3.2 g/L or greater, alanine aminotransferse (ALT)/aspartate aminotransferase (AST) levels below 2.5 x the upper limit of normal (ULN), bilirubin levels below 1.5 x ULN, and creatinine levels below 1.5 x ULN; an ECOG performance status of 2 or lower; and normal cardiac ejection fractions. Screening lumbar puncture was required. Patients with asymptomatic central nervous system disease were permitted to enroll and receive intrathecal (IT) chemotherapy, and IT prophylaxis was both permitted and encouraged for all.
Eligible patients received 12 µg/kg of tagraxofusp on days 4 through 6, 75 mg/m2 of azacitidine on days 1 through 7, and 400 mg of venetoclax on days 1 through 21 for a 28-day cycle. Venetoclax ramp-up occurred on days 1 through 3 of cycle 1. Notably, patients were hospitalized in cycle 1 until the completion of tagraxofusp administration to monitor for CLS. Outpatient treatment was allowed starting at cycle 2 and beyond.
The study’s primary end point was safety, and key secondary end points included response rate, estimated progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Response evaluation in marrow, skin, and the extramedullary space was also conducted.
What were the baseline characteristics of patients in this study?
In the overall patient population (n = 27), the median age was 70 years (range, 21-81). Most patients were male (93%), White (93%), had non-Hispanic ethnicity (78%), and an ECOG performance status of 1 (63%). “Skin only” disease occurred in 30% of patients. Overall, 37% of patients had a prior or concomitant hematologic malignancy, including chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (n = 4), myelodysplastic syndrome (n = 4), or a myeloproliferative neoplasm (n = 3). Mutations in TET2 (37%), ASXL1 (26%), RNA splicing factor (19%), NRAS/KRAS/FLT3 (15%), and TP53 (7%) were observed.
For patients with relapsed/refractory disease, prior therapies included tagraxofusp (64%), pivekimab sunirine (IMGN632; 36%), venetoclax (27%, 2 with a hypomethlyating agent), and SCT (36%).
Patients with previously untreated BPDCN received a median of 2.5 cycles (range, 1-4) of treatment. In the relapsed/refractory group, the median number of cycles was 2 (range, 1-5).
What additional safety and efficacy data were reported at the meeting?
For patients with previously untreated BPDCN, the median OS, PFS, and DOR were all NR. The 2-year PFS and OS rates were 65% (95% CI, 40%-91%) and 53% (95% CI, 30%-80%), respectively. In the relapsed/refractory group, the median OS was 8.4 months (95% CI, 4.8-21.7) and the median PFS was 6.3 months (95% CI, 2.2-11.2). The median DOR was 7.2 months (95% CI, 5.5-36.4).
In the overall patient population, the most common grade 3 or higher treatment-related AEs were thrombocytopenia (63%), decreased white blood cell count (59%), neutropenia (48%), anemia (19%), and hypoxia (11%). Other AEs included increased ALT levels, increased AST levels, atrial fibrillation, febrile neutropenia, hyperglycemia, hypophosphatemia, multi-organ failure, sinus tachycardia, and syncope (4% each).
No cases of veno-occlussive disease were reported. In the overall patient population, the all-cause mortality rates at 30- and 60-days were 3.7% and 7.4%, respectively. One patient with first-line BPDCN died in cycle 1 due to multi-organ failure, and 1 patient with relapsed/refractory disease died after cycle 1 due to disease progression. The median time from the start of cycle 1 to cycle 2 was 33 days.
Disclosures: Lane receives institutional research funding from AbbVie and Stemline Therapeutics; serves in consulting or advisory roles for Cimeio Therapeutics, IDRx, Jnana Therapeutics, ProteinQure, Qiagen, Stelexis BioSciences, and steering committee for Stemline Therapeutics; and owns stock or stock options with Medzown and Stelexis BioSciences.
References
- Lane AA, Luskin M, Keating J, et al. Tagraxofusp, azacitidine, and venetoclax (TAG-AZA-VEN) triplet therapy shows efficacy, tolerability, and transplant potential in patients with blastic plasmacytoid dendritic cell neoplasm (BPDCN): results of a phase 2 trial. Blood. 2025;146(suppl 1):653. doi:10.1182/blood-2025-653
- Lane AA, Garcia JS, Raulston EG, et al. Phase 1b trial of tagraxofusp in combination with azacitidine with or without venetoclax in acute myeloid leukemia. Blood. 2024;8(3):591-602. doi:10.1182/bloodadvances.2023011721