AHEAD-MERIT Topline Data: Key Takeaways
- AHEAD-MERIT did not meet its PFS co-primary end point.
- Assessment of the other co-primary end point of OS continues and could independently establish a positive trial outcome.
Tenumomeran/raplemomeran plus pembrolizumab missed the PFS end point in HPV16-positive HNSCC.
Tenumomeran/raplemomeran (BNT113) plus pembrolizumab (Keytruda) did not significantly improve progression-free survival (PFS) vs pembrolizumab alone in the first-line treatment of patients with unresectable recurrent or metastatic, HPV16-positive, PD-L1–expressing head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), missing a primary end point of the phase 3 portion of the phase 2/3 AHEAD-MERIT trial (NCT04534205).¹
According to an announcement from BioNTech, the trial’s independent data monitoring committee recommended continuing the trial to assess overall survival (OS), the study’s other primary end point. Under the prespecified statistical design, significant OS improvement could establish a positive outcome despite the PFS result.
“The potential of mRNA cancer immunotherapies in combination regimens lies in their ability to induce immune responses that may translate into durable clinical benefit and, ultimately, prolonged survival of patients. While the PFS result was not statistically significant at this first analysis, the data support continued evaluation of [tenumomeran/raplemomeran] plus pembrolizumab,” Özlem Türeci, MD, cofounder and chief medical officer of BioNTech, stated in a news release. “As immune-mediated anti-tumor effects build and deepen over time, the analysis of the second dual primary endpoint, overall survival, will be critical to fully assess the potential of this approach to deliver durable benefit for patients with HPV-driven head and neck cancer.”
Findings from an exploratory analysis of the safety run-in, phase 2 portion of AHEAD-MERIT presented at the
The investigational mRNA cancer immunotherapy encodes the E6 and E7 proteins of HPV16, which are frequently expressed in HPV16-positive solid tumors.1,2 It is designed to induce HPV16-specific antitumor immune responses and enhance activity when combined with checkpoint inhibitor therapy.3
BioNTech previously announced FDA fast track designation for the immunotherapy in January 2026, based on preliminary safety and efficacy findings from AHEAD-MERIT.
The open-label, multicenter phase 2/3 trial included a nonrandomized safety run-in and a randomized comparison of the combination vs pembrolizumab alone.4
Eligible patients needed to be at least 18 years of age with histologically confirmed recurrent or metastatic HPV16-positive HNSCC considered incurable by local therapy. Tumors needed to express PD-L1 with a combined positive score of at least 1, assessed using the 22C3 pharmDx assay. Measurable disease, a tumor tissue sample, and an ECOG performance status of 0 or 1 are required.
Prior systemic anticancer treatment in the incurable recurrent or metastatic setting was prohibited. Systemic therapy for locally advanced disease was permitted if completed more than 180 days before randomization. Patients with nasopharyngeal primary tumors were excluded.
In the randomized portion of the study, patients received tenumomeran/raplemomeran plus pembrolizumab or pembrolizumab alone.
The dual primary end points of the randomized portion were PFS by BICR using RECIST 1.1 criteria and OS. Secondary end points include ORR, duration of response, investigator-assessed PFS, and safety, including treatment-emergent adverse effects (AEs) and treatment modifications associated with AEs.
In the ESMO 2024 safety run-in analysis, all patients (n = 15) experienced an any-grade treatment-emergent AE (TEAE), and 53.3% had grade 3 or higher TEAEs; the rate of any-grade and grade 3 or higher treatment-related TEAEs were 100% and 13.3%. Frequently observed AEs included pyrexia, chills, fatigue, nausea, hypothyroidism, and influenza-like illness. One fatal AE of pulmonary sepsis was considered unrelated to treatment. No TE AEs led to discontinuation of tenumomeran/raplemomeran; 1 patient discontinued pembrolizumab because of an AE.
Stay up to date on the most recent and practice-changing oncology data
Subscribe





