Back

Reassessing Continuous vs Fixed-Duration Therapy in Treatment-Naive Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia

Reassessing Continuous vs Fixed-Duration Therapy in Treatment-Naive Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia

Sameh Gaballa, MD, of Moffitt Cancer Center; M. Yair Levy, MD, of Texas Oncology–Baylor Charles A. Sammons Cancer Center; and Andrew H. Lipsky, MD, of Columbia University Irving Medical Center, discuss how they choose between continuous Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy and fixed-duration, venetoclax-based therapy for patients with treatment-naive chronic lymphocytic leukemia, including genomic testing, long-term trial data, cardiac and infection safety, retreatment, the first-line role of pirtobrutinib, and next-generation agents.

Reassessing Continuous vs Fixed-Duration Therapy in Treatment-Naive Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia

Episodes

All
All

M. Yair Levy, MD, of Texas Oncology–Baylor Charles A. Sammons Cancer Center, explains that second-generation Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitors have more focused kinase profiles, so acalabrutinib and zanubrutinib carry a better cardiovascular profile than ibrutinib and are favored in guidelines.