For part 2, those who received placebo and experienced recurrence or those who received the immunotherapy and experienced recurrence that happened at least 3 months following part 1 completion, are able to receive subsequent cemiplimab.
The primary end point of the trial was DFS, and secondary end points comprised freedom from locoregional recurrence and distant recurrence, overall survival (OS), second primary CSCC tumors, and safety. Investigators will also examine patient-reported outcomes as an exploratory end point.
The median patient age across the cemiplimab and placebo arms was 70.5 years (range, 33-95) and more than half were at least 65 years (73.2% vs 68.4%). Most patients were White (90.4% vs 91.7%), had an ECOG performance status of 0 (63.6% vs 63.6%), had their high-risk tumor located in the head and neck area (79.4% vs 85.9%), fell into a high-risk category of nodal (59.8% vs 56.8%), and a PD-L1 tumor proportion score of 1% or higher (74.2% vs 74.8%). Just under half of patients were from Australia or New Zealand (43.1% vs 43.7%).
What else was learned about the efficacy of adjuvant cemiplimab in this CSCC population?
Additional data published in the New England Journal of Medicine showed that the immunotherapy prolonged freedom from locoregional (HR, 0.20; 95% CI, 0.08-0.40) and distant recurrences (HR, 0.35; 95 % CI, 0.17-0.72) vs placebo.
At the time of the data cutoff date, 25 deaths had been recorded. The 2-year OS rate with cemiplimab was 94.8% (95% CI, 89.6%-97.4%) vs 92.3% (95% CI, 86.5%-95.7%) with placebo (HR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.39-1.90). At a later data cutoff date of April 7, 2025, 33 deaths had been reported, and the HR for OS was 0.78 (95% CI, 0.39-1.56).
What was the safety profile of adjuvant cemiplimab in CSCC?
Any-grade adverse effects (AEs) occurred in 91.2% of patients and they were grade 3 or higher for 23.9% of patients. Serious toxicities were observed in 17.6% of patients who received the immunotherapy, with 15.1% of cases being grade 3 or higher in severity. AEs led to discontinuation for 9.8% of those who received cemiplimab; 2 AEs proved fatal.
The most common AEs experienced by at least 10% of patients in the cemiplimab arm included fatigue (any grade, 22.0%; grade ≥3, 0.5%), pruritus (16.1% vs 0.5%), rash (16.1% vs 0.5%), diarrhea (15.6% vs 1.5%), arthralgia (12.7%; 0%), hypothyroidism (11.7% vs 0.5%), maculopapular rash (11.2%; 0%), and Bowen’s disease (7.8%; 0.5%).
Is cemiplimab approved for adjuvant use in the United States? What is the significance of this regulatory decision?
In October 2025, the FDA approved cemiplimab for adjuvant use in adult patients with CSCC at high risk of recurrence after surgery and radiation based on data from C-POST.3 In an exclusive interview4 with OncLive®, which also aired as an OncLive On Air podcast episode,5Vishal A. Patel, MD, FAAD, FACMS, explained the clinical significance of the decision: “The approval of cemiplimab for adults with CSCC at high risk of recurrence after surgery and radiation represents a major advance for our patients and for the field,” he said.6 “Until now, these patients often with large nodal disease, extracapsular extension, perineural invasion that's clinically or radiographically significant, or deeply invasive tumors that go down to the bone, had no real proven systemic adjuvant option. And even after surgery and radiation, the recurrence risk remained substantial, [which] created a real unmet need.”