What were the baseline characteristics of patients enrolled in LITESPARK-011?
The median patient age in the combination arm was 63.0 years (range, 30-85) vs 62.5 years (range, 30-86). Most patients were male (73.6% vs 77.7%) and had a KPS score of 90 or 100 (74.4% vs 73.7%). In terms of geographic region, 17.3% of those in the belzutifan/lenvatinib arm were from North America, 59.6% from Western Europe, and 23.2% from the rest of the world; in the cabozantinib arm, these rates were 16.8%, 57.4%, and 17.6%, respectively. Most patients across the combination and monotherapy arms had an IMDC prognostic risk that was intermediate (score 1-2), at 60.9% and 57.2%, respectively. More than half of patients had received 1 prior line of adjuvant therapy (67.9% vs 66.8%), and about half had received 1 prior VEGF TKI (54.7% vs 54.5%).
What prior data were reported from LITESPARK-011?
At a data cutoff date of April 9, 2025, the median PFS with belzutifan plus lenvatinib was 14.8 months (95% CI, 11.2-16.6) vs 10.7 months (95% CI, 9.2-11.1) with cabozantinib (HR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.59-0.84; 1-sided P = .00007). The 12-month PFS rates in the respective arms were 55.0% and 41.0%, and the 24-month PFS rates were 35.6% vs 19.1%.
The median OS with the combination was 34.9 months (95% CI, 27.5-not reached) vs 27.6 months (95% CI, 24.0-31.4) with the monotherapy (HR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.68-1.05; 1-sided P = .06075). In the belzutifan/lenvatinib arm, the 12- and 24-month OS rates were 79.7% and 62.8%, respectively; in the cabozantinib arm, these rates were 77.7% and 55.4%.
The ORRs in the respective arms were 52.6% (95% CI, 47.3%-57.7%) and 40.2% (95% CI, 35.2%-45.3%), translating to an estimated difference of 12.4% (95% CI, 5.3%-19.3%). The median DOR with the combination was 23.0 months (95% CI, 2.0-44.3+) vs 12.3 months (95% CI, 1.8+ to 35.9+) with the monotherapy. The 12- and 24-month DOR rates with belzutifan plus lenvatinib were 66.7% and 49.5%, respectively; these rates were 50.0% and 25.5%, respectively, with cabozantinib.
What was the safety profile of belzutifan plus lenvatinib in this population of patients with ccRCC?
Adverse effects (AEs) were reported in 99.7% of patients, with 84.1% of effects grade 3 or higher in severity. Serious AEs occurred in 51.6% of patients who received the regimen. Toxicities led to dose reductions of VEGFR TKI or belzutifan for 66.5% and 33.8% of patients, respectively. AEs led to discontinuation of all study drugs for 11.1% of patients, of belzutifan for 16.8% of patients, or of VEGFR TKI for 21.1% of patients.
Treatment-related AEs (TRAEs) occurred in 97.6% of patients who received the combination, with 71.6% of these effects grade 3 or higher. Serious TRAEs were reported in 26.5% of patients who received belzutifan plus lenvatinib. Two TRAEs proved fatal in this arm.
The most common treatment-emergent AEs reported in at least 20% of patients who received the combination included anemia (69.2%), hypertension (58.9%), diarrhea (52.7%), fatigue (45.1%), nausea (40.5%), decreased appetite (39.2%), proteinuria (36.8%), hypothyroidism (35.7%), vomiting (31.4%), arthralgia (28.9%), asthenia (28.4%), decreased weight (28.1%), constipation (26.2%), headache (22.2%), increased aspartate aminotransferase level (21.1%), palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia syndrome (20.5%), increased alanine aminotransferase level (18.9%), stomatitis (14.1%), and dysgeusia (12.4%).
References
- FDA approves belzutifan in combination with lenvatinib for advanced renal cell carcinoma with a clear cell component. FDA. September 24, 2026. Accessed September 24, 2026. https://www.fda.gov/drugs/resources-information-approved-drugs/fda-approves-belzutifan-combination-lenvatinib-advanced-renal-cell-carcinoma-clear-cell-component
- Motzer RJ, Park SH, McDermott RS, et al. Belzutifan (bel) plus lenvatinib (lenva) versus cabozantinib (cabo) for advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) after anti–PD-(L)1 therapy: Open-label phase 3 LITESPARK-011 study. J Clin Oncol. 2026;44(suppl 7):LBA417. doi:10.1200/JCO.2026.44.7_suppl.LBA417