In total, 87 patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive IBI363 plus bevacizumab (n = 45) or docetaxel (n = 42), with stratification by smoking history and by whether brain metastases were present at baseline.1
In the experimental arm, patients were given IBI363 at 3 mg/kg and bevacizumab at 7.5 mg/kg, both every 3 weeks; those in the control arm received docetaxel at 75 mg/m2 every 3 weeks.
Median follow-up was 8.48 months (range, 2.1-15.1) in the combination arm and 7.59 months (range, 0.2-14.8) in the docetaxel arm. Because 1 patient randomly assigned to docetaxel withdrew before receiving treatment, the safety populations included 45 and 41 patients, respectively.
Safety and investigator-assessed PFS per RECIST 1.1 criteria served as the primary end points of the randomized cohort.1 Other efficacy measures included confirmed and unconfirmed ORR, disease control rate (DCR), duration of response (DOR), and overall survival (OS).
Secondary outcomes include pharmacokinetic parameters (maximum plasma concentration, area under the concentration-time curve, half-life, clearance, and volume of distribution) as well as immunogenicity, assessed by anti-IBI363 antibodies.2
The mean age in the randomized cohort was 62.7 years in the IBI363 arm and 63.2 years in the docetaxel arm, and all patients were Asian.1 Men made up 73.3% and 90.5% of the respective arms, and 24.4% vs 14.3% had never smoked.
All patients in the combination arm had stage IV disease, compared with 95.2% of those in the docetaxel arm. Brain metastases were present at baseline in 24.4% vs 23.8% of patients. Among patients with available data, 88.9% vs 85.4% had an ECOG performance status of 1.
IBI363 Plus Bevacizumab in Lung Adenocarcinoma: Key Takeaways
- IBI363 plus bevacizumab reduced the risk of progression or death compared with docetaxel (HR, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.23-0.68; P = .0006), with median progression-free survival at 4.4 vs 3.4 months, respectively.
- Confirmed objective response rates were 20.0% vs 7.1%; overall survival and duration-of-response data remained immature.
- Grade 3 or higher TRAEs occurred in 53.3% vs 75.6% of patients, although serious TRAEs were more frequent with the combination (46.7% vs 36.6%).
PD-L1 expression was below 1% in 51.1% of patients in the combination arm vs 38.1% of those in the docetaxel arm and at least 1% in 28.9% vs 40.5%; PD-L1 status was unavailable for 20.0% vs 21.4%.
Patients in the 2 arms had received 1 (57.8% vs 54.8%), 2 (24.4% vs 23.8%), or at least 3 (17.8% vs 21.4%) prior lines of therapy. In addition to universal prior immunotherapy exposure, 86.7% vs 92.9% had previously received platinum-based therapy.
What additional efficacy findings were reported?
The unconfirmed ORR was 26.7% (95% CI, 14.6%-41.9%) with IBI363 plus bevacizumab vs 11.9% (95% CI, 4.0%-25.6%) with docetaxel, and the DCRs were 77.8% (95% CI, 62.9%-88.8%) and 66.7% (95% CI, 50.5%-80.4%), respectively. DOR and OS data were not yet mature.
In exploratory analyses by PD-L1 tumor proportion score (TPS), patients with a TPS of at least 1% had a median PFS of 8.1 months with the combination (n = 13) vs 2.8 months with docetaxel (n = 17; HR, 0.152; 95% CI, 0.047-0.490).
In patients with a TPS below 1%, median PFS was 4.2 months (n = 23) vs 3.8 months (n = 16), respectively (HR, 0.541; 95% CI, 0.242-1.213). Although the HRs in both subgroups numerically favored the combination, the confidence interval crossed 1 in the TPS-below-1% subgroup, and these exploratory analyses included small numbers of patients.
What safety findings were reported?
Treatment-emergent adverse effects (TEAEs) of any grade occurred in all treated patients, and grade 3 or higher TEAEs occurred in 62.2% of patients in the IBI363 arm vs 78.0% of those in the docetaxel arm. Treatment-related AEs (TRAEs) were reported in 97.8% vs 100% of patients, respectively, including grade 3 or higher TRAEs in 53.3% vs 75.6%.
Serious TEAEs occurred in 57.8% vs 39.0% of patients, and serious TRAEs occurred in 46.7% vs 36.6%. TRAEs led to treatment discontinuation in 8.9% vs 7.3% of patients. No treatment-related deaths occurred in the combination arm; 1 occurred in the docetaxel arm.
The most common TRAEs with the combination included arthralgia (53.3%), anemia (48.9%), hypothyroidism (46.7%), rash (46.7%), proteinuria (42.2%), and hyperthyroidism (42.2%); grade 3 or higher rash occurred in 11.1% of patients. In the docetaxel arm, grade 3 or higher decreases in neutrophil and white blood cell counts were observed in 58.5% and 51.2% of patients, respectively.
No new safety signals were identified, and the investigators concluded that the data support continued evaluation of IBI363 in non–small cell lung cancer, including in the ongoing phase 3 MarsLight-11 trial (NCT07217301).
References
- Zhou J. IBI363 (TAK-928) plus bevacizumab (Bev) vs docetaxel (DTX) in patients with locally advanced or metastatic immunotherapy-resistant lung adenocarcinoma without actionable genomic alterations: a randomized phase Ib study. Presented at: 2026 ESMO Congress; October 23-27, 2026; Madrid, Spain. Abstract 1952RO
- A study of IBI363 in subjects with advanced malignancies. ClinicalTrials.gov. Accessed October 26, 2026. https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06468098