
ImmunoPRISM Trial Shows Teclistamab Improves Depth of Response and Progression-Free Survival in High-Risk Smoldering Multiple Myeloma
Key Takeaways
- A randomized phase 2 comparison in high-risk smoldering multiple myeloma showed BCMA×CD3 bispecific teclistamab outperformed lenalidomide/dexamethasone, supporting immune-based interception before symptomatic transformation.
- Response depth strongly favored teclistamab: 75.6% achieved complete response and 87% reached VGPR or better, whereas no complete responses and only 14% VGPR+ occurred with lenalidomide/dexamethasone.
Dana-Farber investigators presented encouraging positive results from the phase 2 ImmunoPRISM trial in smoldering myeloma.
In a first-of-its-kind randomized trial,
The results were presented by
Three-quarters of patients receiving teclistamab (75.6%) achieved a complete response, compared with none in the group who received the combination therapy. Teclistamab also drove exceptionally deep remissions based on highly sensitive testing. Among patients who could be evaluated for minimal residual disease (MRD), a measure of whether cancer cells can still be detected at very low levels, 82% of those in the teclistamab group became MRD-negative. No patients in group that received combination therapy achieved MRD negativity. All MRD-negative responses remained ongoing at the time of the data cutoff.
“These are striking results because this is the first randomized study to show that a BCMA-targeted bispecific therapy can outperform a lenalidomide-based approach in high-risk smoldering myeloma,” said Nadeem. “We saw rapid, deep responses, including a high rate of complete responses and MRD negativity, and those responses have remained durable so far. These findings suggest that treating patients earlier — before they develop symptomatic multiple myeloma — may meaningfully change the trajectory of the disease.”
About 50 percent of patients with high-risk smoldering multiple myeloma will progress to active multiple myeloma within two years. Current standard of care for high-risk smoldering myeloma is observation, however a combination of lenalidomide plus dexamethasone has been shown in previously clinical trials to delay progression.
Teclistamab, which engages both cancer cells and T cells to redirect T cells to the cancer, is approved for the treatment of relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. T-cell redirection, however, might be more effective if used earlier in the disease process, before patients are exposed to therapies that can increase the chances of drug resistance, and before they transition into full-blown multiple myeloma, which can compromise immune system function.
ImmunoPRISM enrolled 59 patients with high-risk smoldering multiple myeloma based on established risk criteria. Patients were randomized, with 45 receiving teclistamab and 14 receiving the lenalidomide combination therapy. Beyond complete responses, 87% of patients treated with teclistamab achieved a very good partial response or better, compared with 14% in the combination therapy group.
Teclistamab also significantly improved progression free survival, with 7% of patients in the teclistamab progressing after a median 23.4 months of follow up, compared to 36% in the combination therapy group. An estimated 92 percent of patients will be alive and disease free after two years with teclistamab compared to an estimated 51 percent with the combination therapy.
While 71 percent of patients receiving teclistamab experienced cytokine release syndrome (CRS), a known side effect of some T-cell therapies, all were low grade. No neurological toxicities were observed. Other observed side effects were manageable, and rates of high-grade infections were lower than observed in clinical trials of patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma treated with teclistamab.
"Taken together, these findings provide compelling evidence that early immunologic intervention may be a highly effective strategy for myeloma interception,” said







































































