Ropeginterferon alfa-2b in Polycythemia Vera: Meta-analysis takeaways
- Ropeginterferon alfa-2b improved CHR, PMR, and JAK2 V617F allele burden vs phlebotomy alone, based on data from the phase 2 Low-PV trial in low-risk patients.
- No statistically significant differences were observed vs hydroxyurea for any of the 3 outcomes across PROUD-PV and CONTINUATION-PV.
- Substantial heterogeneity, overlapping trial populations, and a 12-month horizon limit the strength of the pooled conclusions.
How was the meta-analysis designed?
The investigators conducted a systematic search of PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane, and Embase through April 2025 in accordance with PRISMA 2020 guidelines, including randomized controlled trials that compared ropeginterferon alfa-2b with standard therapies in patients with polycythemia vera.1 Random-effects models were used to derive ORs for dichotomous outcomes and MDs for continuous outcomes, and sensitivity and subgroup analyses were performed.
Three trials met the inclusion criteria. In Low-PV, ropeginterferon alfa-2b was compared with phlebotomy plus low-dose aspirin; in PROUD-PV, the comparator was hydroxyurea; and in CONTINUATION-PV, the comparator was hydroxyurea or best available therapy.
CHR was defined as hematocrit of 45% or lower maintained without disease progression over 12 months. PMR was defined as a reduction of at least 20% in JAK2 V617F allele frequency from baseline at 12 months per European LeukemiaNet criteria, and the third outcome was the change in mean JAK2 V617F allele burden from baseline. Risk of bias was assessed using the RoB 2.0 tool, with included studies rated as having “some concerns” overall.
What did the trial-level data show?
Within the hydroxyurea comparison, the OR for CHR was 0.55 (95% CI, 0.28-1.06) in CONTINUATION-PV (59 of 95 vs 57 of 76 patients) and 0.90 (95% CI, 0.55-1.49) in PROUD-PV (53 of 123 vs 57 of 125 patients), with low heterogeneity (I2 = 29%).1 For PMR, the respective ORs were 0.75 (95% CI, 0.41-1.39; 41 of 94 vs 38 of 75 patients) and 0.71 (95% CI, 0.42-1.19; 42 of 123 vs 52 of 123 patients), with no heterogeneity (I2 = 0%).
The allele burden findings diverged between the 2 hydroxyurea-controlled studies: the MD was −19.50 (95% CI, −20.28 to −18.72) in CONTINUATION-PV, favoring ropeginterferon alfa-2b, and 5.70 (95% CI, 5.22-6.18) in PROUD-PV, favoring hydroxyurea (I2 = 100%).
Heterogeneity was substantial for each overall pooled analysis, with I2 values of 81% for CHR, 76% for PMR, and 100% for allele burden.
What are the limitations of the analysis?
The phlebotomy comparison rests on a single trial enrolling low-risk patients, and the wide CI around the PMR estimate reflects the absence of molecular responses in the control arm. CONTINUATION-PV enrolled patients who completed PROUD-PV, so the 2 hydroxyurea-controlled datasets are drawn from overlapping patient populations. The outcomes assessed were limited to 12 months, and safety was not reported in the poster.
The authors noted that larger and longer-term trials are needed to confirm these benefits across broader populations.
References
- Bakht D, Hasan AH, Haris HM, et al. Ropeginterferon alfa-2b in polycythemia vera: a PRISMA-compliant systematic review and meta-analysis. Presented at: 2026 Society of Hematologic Oncology (SOHO) Annual Meeting; September 9-12, 2026; Houston, TX.
- FDA approves ropeginterferon alfa-2b for essential thrombocythemia. OncLive. Published August 31, 2026. Accessed October 5, 2026. https://www.onclive.com/view/fda-approves-ropeginterferon-alfa-2b-for-essential-thrombocythemia