Among 443 enrolled patients, 439 were included in the primary analysis; 4 patients lacked sufficient data for that analysis but were retained in the safety population.
The primary end point was OS. Surviving patients were censored at the latest date they were last contacted or confirmed to be alive. Key secondary objectives included imaging-based PFS, patient characteristics, and safety. Imaging-based PFS spanned the interval from the start of therapy to death or the first progression seen on imaging, as judged by the investigator and documented in the chart. Both PET and conventional imaging were used. Of 1446 imaging examinations performed for tumor evaluation over the course of treatment, 605 were PET scans. The study also described time to treatment failure, best response, treatment patterns, and subsequent therapy.
What were the baseline patient characteristics?
The median age in the primary analysis population was 73.0 years (range, 37.0-90.0). Among patients with available Gleason scores (n = 400) 59.0% had scores of 8 to 10, and 41.0% had scores of 6 or 7. Of patients with known metastatic status at diagnosis (n = 432), 53.0% had metastatic disease at presentation.
Bone metastases were present in 93.2% of patients, and lymph node metastases were reported in 57.6%. Other metastatic sites included the liver (8.9%), lung (8.7%), and brain (0.9%); patients could have involvement at multiple sites.
The median number of prior treatments was 3. Patients had received a median of 2 ARPIs and 1 taxane chemotherapy; 209 patients (47.6%) had received at least 2 prior taxane chemotherapies.
Among patients with documented ECOG performance status (n = 421), 77.7% had a score of 0 or 1 and 84 (20.0%) had a score of 2. Nine patients had a score of 3 and 1 had a score of 4.
Median baseline prostate-specific antigen level was 64.5 ng/mL. Among patients with assessable creatinine clearance (n = 386), the median was 55.8 mL/min (range, 10.4-151.8). Creatinine clearance was below 30 mL/min in 6.2% of patients, 30 to less than 60 mL/min in 53.4% of patients, and at least 60 mL/min in 40.4% of patients. Ongoing comorbidities assessed using the Charlson score were reported in 34.4% of the overall population.
PSMA-REACH: Key Takeaways
- Median OS with lutetium Lu 177 vipivotide tetraxetan was 13.1 months in a French cohort previously treated with an ARPI and taxane chemotherapy.
- Patients received a median of 4 treatment cycles; 39.6% completed all 6 cycles.
- No new safety signals were identified, although safety reporting focused on prespecified events and the study was retrospective.
What additional effectiveness findings were reported?
A total of 267 patients (60.8%) had died at the time of the OS analysis. In exploratory subgroup analyses, median OS was 15.8 months among patients with 1 prior taxane chemotherapy (n = 230) compared with 11.3 months among the patients who received at least 2 prior taxane chemotherapies (n = 209).
Median time to treatment failure was 8.7 months (95% CI, 7.9-9.3) among 434 patients.
Response data were missing for 70 patients. Among patients with response information (n = 369), the complete response rate was 5.1%, the partial response rate was 36.0%, the stable disease rate was 21.1%, and the progressive disease rate was 37.7%. Median times to complete and partial response were 5.0 and 4.6 months, respectively.
What treatment patterns and safety findings were observed?
Patients received a median of 4 cycles. Overall, 39.6% received all 6 planned cycles, and 59.2% stopped treatment before the sixth cycle. Adverse effects (AEs) led to permanent discontinuation in 6.1% of patients, and 8.7% required at least 1 dose reduction.
In the safety population (n = 443), 15.8% experienced at least 1 prespecified AE during treatment. These AEs occurred a median of 3.1 months after treatment initiation, and 90.4% had resolved by the end of the study.
Subsequent therapy was reported for 195 patients (44.4%). Among these patients, cabazitaxel was the most frequently recorded next treatment at 46.2%, followed by enzalutamide (Xtandi) at 11.3%. Other reported options included radium-223 dichloride (Xofigo), olaparib (Lynparza), docetaxel, actinium-based PSMA therapy, and immunotherapy.
References
- Barthélémy P, Roubaud G, Fléchon A, et al. PSMA-REACH: real-world effectiveness and safety of [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 in patients with mCRPC. Paper presented at: ESMO Congress 2026; October 23-26, 2026; Madrid, Spain. Abstract 2288P
- Sartor O, de Bono J, Chi KN, et al; VISION Investigators. Lutetium-177–PSMA-617 for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2021;385(12):1091-1103. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2107322
- Pluvicto. Prescribing information. Updated July 2026. Accessed November 4, 2026. https://www.novartis.com/us-en/sites/novartis_us/files/pluvicto.pdf