
Compare first-line EGFR-mutant NSCLC options, weighing amivantamab–lazertinib vs chemo–osimertinib, plus practical start-up and prevention tips.
Edgardo Santos, MD, FACP, FASCO, of Starling Oncology, and Wade Iams, MD, MSCI, of Tennessee Oncology, work through how they choose among first-line options for EGFR exon 19 deletion and L858R advanced non–small cell lung cancer. Both favor a combination regimen over third-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor monotherapy, citing the overall survival advantage seen with amivantamab plus lazertinib in MARIPOSA and with platinum-based chemotherapy plus osimertinib in FLAURA2. Dr Santos cites 3-year intracranial progression-free survival of 36% with the combination vs 18% with osimertinib in MARIPOSA as the reason he favors it when brain metastases are present. Dr Iams describes the pragmatic COPERNICUS study, which pairs every-4-week subcutaneous amivantamab with prophylactic anticoagulation and enhanced dermatologic prophylaxis, and reports rash falling from roughly 50% to 60% down to 20% to 30%. Dr Santos details his day 1 order set, and across 2 cases the faculty weigh brain metastases, chronic kidney disease, prior thrombosis, travel distance, and patient preference.

Compare first-line EGFR-mutant NSCLC options, weighing amivantamab–lazertinib vs chemo–osimertinib, plus practical start-up and prevention tips.

Experts compare first-line EGFR-mutated NSCLC regimens, showing why subcutaneous amivantamab+lazertinib and chemo+osimertinib boost survival.