ADT in Prostate Cancer: Agonists Versus Antagonists

For High-Definition, Click

Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) continues to be the mainstay for treating advancing prostate cancer. LHRH agonists, which have been used for decades, create a surge in the testosterone (T) level, and following, the hypothalamic pituitary-gonadal axis shuts down, Neal D. Shore, MD, states.

In 2009, the first LHRH antagonist was approved. Unlike agonists, these newer agents have the benefit of not creating a surge in testosterone The clinical endpoint for approval for both drug classes was T level <50. Shore notes that a level of 50 was used primarily because tests at that time were unable to detect levels lower than 50. However, it is now recognized that lower T levels, particularly in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer, affect survival. Thus, he stresses the importance of checking patients’ T levels.

There is a lack of clear-cut evidence that a particular ADT strategy results in consistently lower T levels. Shore explains that the real question is whether there are other metrics, including follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), the surge phenomenon, and the continuity of T suppression, which are capable of differentiating between the impact of agonists and that of antagonists. Additionally, researchers are investigating a possible difference in the agents’ risk profiles for cardiovascular events.

Related Videos
Rohan Garje, MD
Manmeet Ahluwalia, MD, MBA, FASCO
Anthony V. D'Amico, MD, PhD
Petros Grivas, MD, PhD; and Chandler Park, MD, MSc, FACP
Stephen J. Freedland, MD
Viktor Grünwald, MD, PhD
Timothy Yap, MBBS, PhD, FRCP
David A. Braun, MD, PhD, assistant professor, medicine (medical oncology), Louis Goodman and Alfred Gilman Yale Scholar, member, Center of Molecular and Cellular Oncology, Yale Cancer Center
Timothy Yap, MBBS, PhD, FRCP
Sumanta Kumar Pal, MD, FASCO,