The incorporation of brentuximab vedotin (Adcetris) into the frontline treatment of patients with Hodgkin lymphoma correlates with superior efficacy, irrespective of PET2 results, suggesting loss of predictive value with the scan.
The incorporation of brentuximab vedotin (Adcetris) into the frontline treatment of patients with Hodgkin lymphoma correlates with superior efficacy, irrespective of PET2 results, according to data from a review presented at the 2023 SOHO Annual Meeting.
Findings from the review showed that among the 40 patients treated with brentuximab vedotin plus doxorubicin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (BvAVD), 24 were PET2 negative and 12 were PET2 positive. All the patients who were PET2 negative had a negative EOT-PET, which indicated no progression of cancer. Of the 12 PET-positive patients, 4 had a positive end-of-treatment PET.
No meaningful impact on the management of patients was noted with the results of PET2 scans, and only 1 patient had a change in chemotherapy regimen after PET2 among all 40 patients who started on the BvAVD regimen initially. Additionally, no differences were observed in outcomes between the patients who were PET2 positive with a negative EOT-PET vs PET2-negative patients.
“We concluded that incorporation of brentuximab vedotin into frontline treatment results in superior efficacy, regardless of PET2 results. Our data, along with previous studies, points to the loss of predictive value, and therefore, redundancy of an interim PET2 scan, providing the evidence for safe omission of PET2 in treatment regimens containing brentuximab vedotin,” Ravand Samaeekia, MD, MS, chief resident at Loma Linda University Internal Medicine, said during the presentation.
The standard-of-care for patients with Hodgkin lymphoma is interim PET2 due to its prognostic value and utility in PET-adapted treatment protocols. However, with the incorporation of brentuximab vedotin, a novel, anti-CD30 antibody-drug conjugate, into frontline treatment, the value of PET2 imaging is uncertain.
Investigators sought to determine whether interim PET assessment after 2 cycles of treatment still has predictive value for patients with Hodgkin lymphoma by reviewing frontline trials incorporating brentuximab vedotin and reported interim PET data. These trials were evaluated for 3 years, between December 2018-December 2022, and patients were from Loma Linda University Cancer Center. PET2 and end-of-treatment PET (EOT-PET) results of patients with Hodgkin lymphoma treated with BvAVD in the same period were also reviewed.
In 3 studies which have already been performed, ECHELON-1 (NCT01712490), AHOD1331 (NCT02166463), and BREACH (NCT02292979), brentuximab vedotin was incorporated into the frontline and interim PET data were assessed. Each of these studies showed that progression-free survival (PFS) or overall survival rates were significantly higher with brentuximab vedotin among patients with PET2-negative or PET2-positive disease.
In the ACCRU-LY study (NCT02758717), which examined brentuximab vedotin with nivolumab (Opdivo) as a frontline treatment for patients with Hodgkin lymphoma, preliminary data showed a 97% rate of interim PET negativity with a 100% PFS rate at 2 years. The combination, which eliminated chemotherapy, was also well tolerated; however, some neuropathy concerns were noted.2 Although this trial did not meet its prespecified activity criteria, as the overall response rate noted was 61% instead of 80%, the combination was active in older patients.2,3
“All these clinical trials are supporting the idea that receiving brentuximab vedotin has benefits, regardless of being a PET-positive or PET-negative patient,” said Samaeekia.
In the review presented at SOHO 2023, 40 patients were included and treated with BvAVD. A total of 24 were PET2-negative, and 12 were PET2-positive. Nineteen (48%) patients were male, and the median age was 22 years (range, 11-83). At initial diagnosis, 11 patients (28%) had Ann Arbor Stage II disease, 15 (37%) had stage III, and 14 (35%) had stage IV disease. Nineteen percent of patients had a low (0-2) International Prognostic Score while 21% had a high score (3-7), and the majority of patients (68%) had an ECOG performance status of 0-1.
All 24 patients with PET2-negative disease and 8 patients with PET2-positive disease with a negative EOT-PET remained in complete remission at the end of treatment.