Dr. Mesa on Ruxolitinib Vs Fedratinib in Myelofibrosis Treatment

Video

Ruben Mesa, MD, discusses the use of ruxolitinib versus fedratinib in treating patients with myelofibrosis.

Ruben Mesa, MD, the director of the Mays Cancer Center at UT Health San Antonio MD Anderson Cancer Center, discusses the use of ruxolitinib (Jakafi) versus fedratinib (Inrebic) in treating patients with myelofibrosis.

Ruxolitinib has been the approved frontline therapy of choice for several years. The FDA approval of fedratinib immediately impacts patients who did not have an optimal response to ruxolitinib or those who lost their response and may benefit moving on to a different agent, explains Mesa.

Currently, there are no head-to-head data on fedratinib versus ruxolitinib. Both had positive phase III studies, but the agents have slightly different toxicity profiles that need to be considered. Fedratinib may benefit subsets of patients with significant splenomegaly or more advanced myelofibrosis, according to Mesa. Each agent will find its niche in frontline therapy as time goes on, Mesa concludes.

Related Videos
Jeremy M. Pantin, MD, clinical director, Adult Transplant and Cellular Therapy Program, TriStar Centennial Medical Center, bone marrow transplant physician, Sarah Cannon Research Institute
Maria Hafez, MD, assistant professor, breast and sarcoma medical oncologist, director, Clinical Breast Cancer Research, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University
Zeynep Eroglu, MD
Annie Im, MD, FASCO
Sundar Jagannath, MBBS, director, Center of Excellence for Multiple Myeloma, professor of medicine (hematology and medical oncology), The Tisch Cancer Institute, Mount Sinai
Akriti Jain, MD
Raj Singh, MD
Gottfried Konecny, MD
Karim Chamie, MD, associate professor, urology, the University of California, Los Angeles
Mike Lattanzi, MD, medical oncologist, Texas Oncology